Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill documentgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00390 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
document scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Document Accessibility Decisions
Capture all accessibility decisions for a feature in a single, structured record that will survive team changes and redesigns.
Process
Step 1: Identify Decisions
List every design or implementation choice that affects accessibility:
- Interaction patterns chosen
- Content and language decisions
- Visual design decisions
- What was included and what was deferred
- Tradeoffs made under constraints
Step 2: Document Each Decision
Using decision-documentation, for each decision record:
- Context: what prompted the decision
- Decision: what was chosen
- Alternatives: what was considered and rejected
- Impact: who benefits, who is affected
- Evidence: what supported the decision
Step 3: Analyse Tradeoffs
Using tradeoff-analysis, for any decision where accessibility was compromised or where user needs conflicted:
- Who benefits from each option
- Who is harmed by each option
- Severity asymmetry (blocked vs friction)
- Remediation plan for excluded users
- Review date
Step 4: Map to Standards
Using compliance-mapping, map each decision to the relevant WCAG criteria:
- Which criteria does this decision satisfy
- Which criteria does this decision affect
- Are there any conformance risks
Output
Deliver a feature accessibility decision record:
- Feature summary — what was built and for whom
- Decision log — each decision in the standard format
- Tradeoff register — any tradeoffs with remediation plans
- Compliance map — WCAG criteria coverage and gaps
- Open items — deferred decisions that need future resolution
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 54 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 4798a5ffa87f
document is a skill published in the GitHub repository Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills (108 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 390 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
document compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| documentOwl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills | Skill | 108 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |
| webgl-holographic-foilnexu-io/open-design | Skill | 106k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 41 | Claude Code, Codex |
| html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminalnexu-io/open-design | Skill | 106k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 53 | Claude Code, Codex |
| html-ppt-taste-brutalistnexu-io/open-design | Skill | 106k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 78 | Claude Code, Codex |
| visual-ralphYeachan-Heo/oh-my-codex | Skill | 34k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Codex |
| glance-canonical-layoutsandroid/skills | Skill | 10k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 56 | Claude Code |
| accessibilitymicrosoft/hve-core | Skill | 1.6k | yesterday | MIT | A | 47 | Claude Code |