document

document is a skill for Claude Code from Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills. It costs 43 tokens per session (390 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A record of the accessibility choices and compromises made while designing or shipping a feature. Accessibility means making software usable by people with different abilities and assistive technologies.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to document interaction, content, and visual decisions; examine tradeoffs; and map choices to WCAG accessibility guidelines.
Why use it?
It keeps the reasoning behind accessibility decisions available after the original team or design changes. It also identifies who benefits, who may be excluded, and what can be improved.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the accessibility-decisions plugin — 9 skills shipped together

Good fit Use it to document interaction, content, and visual decisions; examine tradeoffs; and map choices to WCAG accessibility guidelines.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill document
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install accessibility-decisions, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 9 skills.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for document

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for document

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/document.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 43 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 390 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00043 $0.00390
Opus 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00156
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00009 $0.00078
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00039

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 4798a5ffa87f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

document scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

accessibility-decisions/skills/document/SKILL.md · 54 lines

What it actually says

Document Accessibility Decisions

Capture all accessibility decisions for a feature in a single, structured record that will survive team changes and redesigns.

Process

Step 1: Identify Decisions

List every design or implementation choice that affects accessibility:

  • Interaction patterns chosen
  • Content and language decisions
  • Visual design decisions
  • What was included and what was deferred
  • Tradeoffs made under constraints

Step 2: Document Each Decision

Using decision-documentation, for each decision record:

  • Context: what prompted the decision
  • Decision: what was chosen
  • Alternatives: what was considered and rejected
  • Impact: who benefits, who is affected
  • Evidence: what supported the decision

Step 3: Analyse Tradeoffs

Using tradeoff-analysis, for any decision where accessibility was compromised or where user needs conflicted:

  • Who benefits from each option
  • Who is harmed by each option
  • Severity asymmetry (blocked vs friction)
  • Remediation plan for excluded users
  • Review date

Step 4: Map to Standards

Using compliance-mapping, map each decision to the relevant WCAG criteria:

  • Which criteria does this decision satisfy
  • Which criteria does this decision affect
  • Are there any conformance risks

Output

Deliver a feature accessibility decision record:

  1. Feature summary — what was built and for whom
  2. Decision log — each decision in the standard format
  3. Tradeoff register — any tradeoffs with remediation plans
  4. Compliance map — WCAG criteria coverage and gaps
  5. Open items — deferred decisions that need future resolution
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 54 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 4798a5ffa87f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

document is a skill published in the GitHub repository Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills (108 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 390 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

document compared with skills from other repositories

document next to 6 skills from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
documentOwl-Listener/inclusive-design-skillsSkill1085mo agoMITA43Claude Code
webgl-holographic-foilnexu-io/open-designSkill106kyesterdayApache-2.0A41Claude Code, Codex
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminalnexu-io/open-designSkill106kyesterdayApache-2.0A53Claude Code, Codex
html-ppt-taste-brutalistnexu-io/open-designSkill106kyesterdayApache-2.0A78Claude Code, Codex
visual-ralphYeachan-Heo/oh-my-codexSkill34k3d agoMITA52Codex
glance-canonical-layoutsandroid/skillsSkill10kyesterdayApache-2.0A56Claude Code
accessibilitymicrosoft/hve-coreSkill1.6kyesterdayMITA47Claude Code