Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill preference-auditgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/preference-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/preference-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/preference-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/preference-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/preference-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00551 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00275 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00110 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00055 |
Grade A, and why
preference-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 71 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Preference Audit
Test whether an existing interface correctly detects and responds to user preferences — the accessibility settings people have deliberately chosen.
Process
Step 1: Test Motion Preferences
Using user-preference-respect, enable prefers-reduced-motion and navigate the entire interface. Document:
- Animations that continue playing
- Transitions that still slide or fade
- Parallax effects that remain active
- Autoplay video or carousels that don't stop
- Any motion that serves no functional purpose
Step 2: Test Contrast and Colour Preferences
Enable prefers-contrast (more) and forced-colors mode. Using user-preference-respect and colour-independence, document:
- Elements that become invisible or indistinguishable
- Focus indicators that disappear
- Interactive elements that lose their borders
- Colour-only status indicators that become meaningless
- Charts or visualisations that become unreadable
Step 3: Test Colour Scheme
Switch between light and dark modes. Document:
- Content that becomes illegible in one mode
- Images or icons that don't adapt
- Hardcoded colours that clash with the theme
- Contrast failures specific to one mode
Step 4: Test Text Scaling and Zoom
Using responsive-accessibility, test at 200% browser zoom and with system font size at maximum. Document:
- Text that overflows or gets clipped
- Layouts that break or overlap
- Horizontal scrolling that appears
- Fixed-height containers that truncate content
- Interactive elements that become unreachable
Step 5: Test Combinations
Test realistic combinations:
- Dark mode + high contrast + reduced motion
- 200% zoom + large system font
- Forced colours + reduced motion
Document any failures that only appear in combination.
Output
Deliver an audit report:
- Summary — which preferences are respected, which are ignored
- Preference-by-preference findings — specific failures for each
- Combination failures — issues that appear only when multiple preferences are active
- Fix list — prioritised by severity and number of users affected
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 71 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A 5e9123227307
preference-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills (98 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 551 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
webgl-holographic-foil
A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ralph with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.
make-resume
A Chinese-language tool for creating editable HTML resumes that can be changed in a browser and printed to PDF. It uses available resume templates when they are installed and otherwise provides a simpler fallback.