Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill responsive-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/responsive-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/responsive-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/responsive-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/responsive-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/responsive-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00561 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00280 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00112 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
responsive-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Responsive Accessibility Review
Test whether an interface maintains accessibility across the full range of screen sizes, zoom levels, and orientations that real users encounter.
Process
Step 1: Viewport Testing
Test the interface at these viewport widths:
- 320px (small mobile)
- 375px (standard mobile)
- 768px (tablet)
- 1024px (small desktop / tablet landscape)
- 1280px (standard desktop)
- 1440px+ (large desktop)
At each viewport, using responsive-accessibility, document:
- Content that overflows or is hidden
- Interactive elements that are unreachable
- Touch targets below 44×44px on touch viewports
- Navigation that doesn't adapt
- Functionality that disappears entirely
Step 2: Zoom Testing
At 1280px viewport, test at:
- 100% (baseline)
- 150% (common for low vision users)
- 200% (WCAG requirement)
Document:
- Horizontal scrolling that appears
- Text that overflows containers
- Overlapping elements
- Sticky headers that consume excessive space
- Modals or tooltips that go off-screen
Step 3: Typography Scaling
Using flexible-typography, test with system font size at maximum. Document:
- Text that doesn't scale
- Containers that clip or truncate text
- Layout that breaks when text grows
- Fixed-height elements that don't expand
Step 4: Orientation Testing
Test in both portrait and landscape. Document:
- Content that only works in one orientation
- Orientation lock that prevents rotation
- Layout that breaks or wastes space in one orientation
Step 5: Density Check
Using information-density, at each viewport verify:
- Is the default density appropriate for the device?
- Can users adjust density?
- Does compact density maintain minimum touch targets?
- Does spacious density work without excessive scrolling?
Output
Deliver a responsive accessibility report:
- Viewport matrix — pass/fail at each viewport width for core tasks
- Zoom results — issues at 150% and 200%
- Typography results — text scaling failures
- Orientation results — portrait/landscape issues
- Fix list — prioritised by severity, grouped by:
- Fixes that affect all viewports
- Fixes specific to mobile
- Fixes specific to zoom
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 77 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 3290eb820d79
responsive-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills (98 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 561 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
chakra-ui-builder
Build responsive, accessible UI components and layouts using Chakra UI v3, install or configure Chakra UI in new and existing projects, and design scalable themes using tokens, semantic tokens, recipes, and slot recipes. Use this skill whenever a user asks to build, create, or generate any UI component, page, form…
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ultragoal with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
frontend-ui-dark-ts
Build dark-themed React applications using Tailwind CSS with custom theming, glassmorphism effects, and Framer Motion animations. Use when creating dashboards, admin panels, or data-rich interfaces with a refined dark aesthetic.
reveal-hover-effect
Build cursor-following spotlight reveals that expose a second aligned image through a soft radial mask. Use for hover-to-color, before-and-after, x-ray, material, texture, product-detail, and illustrated hero effects where a desaturated or embossed base image should remain visible while another treatment follows an…
frontend-visual-qa
Audits already-rendered web, landing-page, HTML deck/slide, browser tool/game, dashboard/admin, design-system, and desktop UIs using real-browser or native-app journeys, inspected screenshots, DOM geometry, responsive or projection viewports, and a bundled Playwright sweep. Use after UI implementation to find…
prototype-web
A clickable, high-fidelity web product prototype with navigation, a hero section, feature cards, steps, social proof, and optional pricing. It is designed to resemble a finished landing page while remaining a prototype.