Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills --skill tradeoff-analysisgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/tradeoff-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/tradeoff-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/tradeoff-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/tradeoff-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/owl-listener/inclusive-design-skills/tradeoff-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00092 | $0.00861 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00046 | $0.00430 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00172 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
tradeoff-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Accessibility Tradeoff Analysis
Analyse accessibility tradeoffs rigorously — because "we can't do everything" is often true, and the quality of the tradeoff decision determines who gets included and who gets excluded.
When Tradeoffs Happen
Conflicting User Needs
- Autoplay captions help deaf users but moving text distracts users with ADHD
- Simplified language helps cognitive accessibility but may feel patronising to some users
- High contrast helps low vision but can cause eye strain for some migraine conditions
Accessibility vs Other Requirements
- Performance: rich accessibility features vs page load speed
- Deadline: full accessibility vs shipping on time
- Complexity: accessible custom component vs simpler but less accessible native element
- Cost: comprehensive testing vs budget constraints
Partial Implementation
- You can make 80% of the feature accessible now and 20% later
- Which 80% do you choose and who does the 20% exclude?
Analysis Framework
For each tradeoff, work through:
1. Who Benefits from Option A?
- Which user groups gain accessibility
- How many users are affected (estimated)
- How severe is the barrier if Option A is not chosen
2. Who Benefits from Option B?
- Same analysis for the alternative
3. Who Is Harmed by Each Option?
- Which user groups lose accessibility or experience degradation
- How severe is the harm
- Is the harm permanent or temporary (will it be fixed later?)
4. What's the Severity Asymmetry?
- A user who CANNOT complete a task (blocked) is more severely affected than a user who finds a task HARDER (friction)
- Prioritise removing blockers over reducing friction
- Prioritise permanent disabilities over situational impairments (situational users have other options; permanent users may not)
5. What's the Reversibility?
- Can this decision be changed later without significant cost?
- If yes: choose the faster option and plan the improvement
- If no: choose the more inclusive option and accept the delay
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 106 lines · 92 tokens per session scan A 3f5d035bf7b8
tradeoff-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository Owl-Listener/inclusive-design-skills (98 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 92 tokens to every session and 861 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
webgl-holographic-foil
A self-contained WebGL2 hero: thin-film interference over a crushed-foil surface whose palette shifts with the viewing angle; move the cursor to tilt the film.
html-ppt-hermes-cyber-terminal
OpenDesign + BYOK: choosing and wiring your own model, hands-on — cost, quality, and the routing decision. Built as a decision-grade AI literacy deck for engineers, IT, applied-AI teams.
html-ppt-taste-brutalist
16:9 HTML deck in tactical-telemetry / CRT-terminal taste. Deactivated-CRT charcoal slides, white-phosphor monospace, hazard-red accent, scanline overlay, ASCII syntax, density over decoration. Distilled from Leonxlnx/taste-skill brutalist-skill (Tactical Telemetry mode).
visual-ralph
Visual Ralph orchestration for frontend UI from generated references, static references, or live URL targets, using $ultragoal with built-in visual verdict and pixel-diff evidence until the implementation matches and leaves a reproducible design system.
accessibility
Consolidated accessibility skill entrypoint for WCAG 2.2, ARIA Authoring Practices, cognitive accessibility, Section 508, EN 301 549, design intent verification, and the Accessibility Planner workflow.
make-resume
A Chinese-language tool for creating editable HTML resumes that can be changed in a browser and printed to PDF. It uses available resume templates when they are installed and otherwise provides a simpler fallback.