Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add oyi77/1ai-skills --skill langchain-patternsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oyi77/1ai-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/langchain-patterns)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/langchain-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/langchain-patterns/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/langchain-patterns"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/oyi77/1ai-skills/langchain-patterns.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.01758 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00879 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00352 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00176 |
Grade A, and why
langchain-patterns scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 273 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Overview
LangChain is the most widely used framework for building LLM applications. LangGraph adds stateful, multi-actor workflows with cycles. Together they provide chains, agents, retrieval, memory, and complex workflow orchestration.
Capabilities
- Build chains with LCEL (LangChain Expression Language)
- Create agents with tool use and reasoning
- Implement RAG with vector stores and retrievers
- Manage conversation memory and context
- Build graph-based workflows with LangGraph
- Integrate with 100+ LLM providers and tools
When to Use
Trigger phrases:
-
"langchain patterns"
-
"LangChain/LangGraph patterns — chains, agents, tools, memory, retrieval, graph w"
-
Building LLM-powered applications (chatbots, RAG, agents)
-
Needing structured chains for multi-step LLM workflows
-
Building stateful agent workflows with branching logic
-
Implementing retrieval-augmented generation
-
Wanting a mature ecosystem with many integrations
When NOT to Use
- Task is outside your authorization scope
- You need to implement controls (use implementing-* skills)
- Task is about analysis, not action (use analyzing-* skills)
- You don't have access to target systems
- Task requires compliance expertise (consult professionals)
- Task is about defense, not offense (use defensive skills)
Pseudo Code
# Example workflow for this skill
def execute(input_data):
# Step 1: Validate input
if not input_data:
raise ValueError("Input data is required")
# Step 2: Process core logic
result = process(input_data)
# Step 3: Validate output
validate_output(result)
return result
LCEL Chain
from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
from langchain_core.output_parsers import StrOutputParser
llm = ChatOpenAI(model="gpt-4o")
prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_messages([
("system", "You are a helpful assistant."),
("user", "{input}"),
])
chain = prompt | llm | StrOutputParser()
result = chain.invoke({"input": "Explain quantum computing in simple terms."})
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 273 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A dce4d5390a33
langchain-patterns is a skill published in the GitHub repository oyi77/1ai-skills (12 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 1,758 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
dify
Use when building LLM applications with visual workflow — RAG knowledge bases, AI agents, chatbots with drag-and-drop orchestration. Dify: open-source LLM app platform supporting 30+ models (OpenAI, Claude, DeepSeek, Ollama, Qwen, GLM) with Docker deployment.
ai-skills
Use when building LLM applications, RAG knowledge bases, AI agents, terminal coding agents, multi-model orchestration, plugin-based agent harnesses, or file translation. Index of 9 skills: Dify, Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, OpenCode, Pi, DocuTranslate, Oh-My-OpenAgent, Superpowers-zh, DeepSeek Harness.
graphify
Build, query, or refresh Graphify knowledge graphs for code and documents when graph-based relationship analysis is useful or explicitly requested.
langchain
Framework for building LLM-powered applications with agents, chains, and RAG. Supports multiple providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), 500+ integrations, ReAct agents, tool calling, memory management, and vector store retrieval. Use for building chatbots, question-answering systems, autonomous agents, or RAG…
vector-and-embedding-weaknesses
Hunt vector / embedding weaknesses (OWASP LLM08:2025) — adversarial inputs against the RAG / similarity layer that cause cross-tenant leak, embedding-inversion privacy loss, semantic confusion, and retriever-driven prompt injection.
sensitive-information-disclosure
Hunt LLM sensitive-information disclosure (OWASP LLM02:2025) — leakage of PII, secrets, internal source, model details, and other-tenant data through model outputs, training-data extraction, or retrieval-side joins.