agentic-coding: Skill for Claude Code

.agents/skills/review-pull-request/SKILL.md

review-pull-request is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from P2ERGmbH/agentic-coding. It costs 41 tokens per session (1,951 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A procedure for reviewing a GitHub pull request, a proposed set of code changes, in an isolated copy of the project. It checks the changes across files and runs project verification where available.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a pull request, identify serious issues, and either request changes or approve it through GitHub.
Why use it?
It reduces the risk of approving changes that break other parts of the project or violate its required practices.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents); mentions Gemini CLI.

This is P2ERGmbH/agentic-coding's own configuration. It tells Claude Code and Codex how to work on agentic-coding itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything agentic-coding configures →

Needs its repository: it reads a path above its own folder, which exists only inside the repository. The line is ln -s ../../node_modules worktrees/pr-<PR_NUMBER>/node_modules.

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to P2ERGmbH/agentic-coding. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/P2ERGmbH/agentic-coding/main/.agents/skills/review-pull-request/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/P2ERGmbH/agentic-coding

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review-pull-request

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/p2ergmbh/agentic-coding/review-pull-request/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/p2ergmbh/agentic-coding/review-pull-request)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/p2ergmbh/agentic-coding/review-pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/p2ergmbh/agentic-coding/review-pull-request/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for review-pull-request

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/p2ergmbh/agentic-coding/review-pull-request"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/p2ergmbh/agentic-coding/review-pull-request.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 41 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,951 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00041 $0.01951
Opus 5.5 $0.00016 $0.00780
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00008 $0.00390
Haiku 4.5 $0.00004 $0.00195

Measured 2mo ago against content hash e1da9c6778ac, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-pull-request scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/review-pull-request/SKILL.md · 120 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 120 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

GitHub Pull Request Review Workflow

This workflow guides you through an extensive and in-depth review of a GitHub Pull Request using the GitHub MCP integration. You act as an uncompromising senior architect and CI/CD gatekeeper.

Trigger

Use this workflow when requested to "review pull request #X", "run a PR review", or when executing within a GitHub Actions review workflow.


Phase 1: Isolated Git Worktree Setup (MANDATORY)

To ensure the review is conducted on the actual PR codebase with full lint, compile, and verification capabilities without polluting your main workspace, you MUST first set up an isolated Git Worktree:

  1. Identify the PR Branch: Fetch the PR branch name ($PR_BRANCH or $HEAD_BRANCH) using mcp_github_get_pull_request.
  2. Create or Switch to Dedicated Worktree: The dedicated worktree directory is worktrees/pr-<PR_NUMBER>.
    • If the worktree directory DOES NOT exist: Create it by cloning/adding the PR branch into the dedicated worktree directory:
      git worktree add worktrees/pr-<PR_NUMBER> <PR_BRANCH>
      
      Note: If the branch isn't available locally, fetch it from origin first:
      git fetch origin pull/<PR_NUMBER>/head:<PR_BRANCH>
      git worktree add worktrees/pr-<PR_NUMBER> <PR_BRANCH>
      
    • If the worktree directory ALREADY exists: Switch to the directory and pull the latest changes:
      cd worktrees/pr-<PR_NUMBER> && git pull
      
  3. Copy Environment Configuration: Copy the .env file from the root project directory into the worktree directory:
    cp .env worktrees/pr-<PR_NUMBER>/.env
    
  4. Symlink Node Modules: Symlink the node_modules directory from the root project directory to the worktree directory to avoid duplicate installation overhead:
    ln -s ../../node_modules worktrees/pr-<PR_NUMBER>/node_modules
    
  5. Start the Review: Execute all subsequent context-gathering (reading files, checking imports) and local linting/compiling inside the dedicated worktree directory worktrees/pr-<PR_NUMBER>.

Read the full file on GitHub · 120 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 120 lines · 41 tokens per session scan A e1da9c6778ac

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-pull-request is a skill published in the GitHub repository P2ERGmbH/agentic-coding (9 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 41 tokens to every session and 1,951 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

pr

Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.

Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode · 47 tokens

merge-batch

Prepare and merge an owner-selected PR batch with contributor credit and exact-candidate admission. Use for a pasted PR list; combined focused validation is diagnostic, and every actual landing still requires its applicable checks and authorization.

diegosouzapw/OmniRoute · 46 tokens

otto-pr-review-loop

Run Polly and OCR on a PR until all findings settle.

omnigent-ai/omnigent · 17 tokens

engram-branch-pr

PR creation workflow for Engram following the issue-first enforcement system. Trigger: When creating a pull request, opening a PR, or preparing changes for review.

Gentleman-Programming/engram · 37 tokens

github-contributor

A step-by-step guide for contributing code, tests, documentation, or build changes to open-source projects you do not maintain. It explains how to prepare a pull request that follows the project’s rules and is easier for maintainers to review.

daymade/claude-code-skills · 105 tokens

revdiff

Review diffs, files, and documents with inline annotations in a TUI overlay, or answer questions about revdiff usage, configuration, themes, and keybindings. Opens revdiff in agterm/tmux/zellij/herdr/kitty/wezterm/cmux/ghostty/iterm2/emacs-vterm, captures annotations, and addresses them. Works in git, hg, and jj repos…

umputun/revdiff · 248 tokens