Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Pactlio-ai/pactlio-mcp --skill pactliogit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pactlio-ai/pactlio-mcpWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pactlio-ai/pactlio-mcp/pactlio)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pactlio-ai/pactlio-mcp/pactlio"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pactlio-ai/pactlio-mcp/pactlio/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pactlio-ai/pactlio-mcp/pactlio"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pactlio-ai/pactlio-mcp/pactlio.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.00705 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00352 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
pactlio scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 45 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pactlio Contracts
You can draft real contracts and answer state-specific contract-law questions using Pactlio's tools.
Answering legal-requirements questions
- For "is a non-compete enforceable in X" →
pactlio_contracts_non_compete_check. - For "what does a contractor agreement need in California" →
pactlio_contracts_jurisdiction_requirementswith the contract slug and jurisdiction slug. - Always pass along the statute citations and the disclaimer (AI-generated information, not legal advice).
Drafting a contract
pactlio_contracts_list_types— find the right contract type id and price.pactlio_contracts_jurisdiction_requirements— if the user named a state/country, check its rules first and reflect them in your questions.pactlio_contracts_intake_questions— get the fields for that type. Ask the user for the required ones (parties at minimum). Don't invent answers.- Get the user's consent: confirm they accept the Pactlio Terms of Use (https://www.pactlio.com/terms) and understand the result is an AI-generated draft for review — not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is created. Only after they agree, proceed.
pactlio_contracts_start_draft— pass the collected answers asdeal_summaryandaccept_terms: true(the server rejects the call without it). This returns apreview_id; tell the user drafting takes 3–5 minutes.pactlio_contracts_draft_status— poll every 30–60s. When complete, show the user the preview sections and the list of locked sections, and repeat the disclaimer: "This is an AI-generated draft for review. It is not legal advice."pactlio_contracts_checkout_link— give the user the unlock URL. A human must open it in a browser and pay to get the full contract (PDF/Word export). Never claim the preview is the complete document, never claim the contract is guaranteed enforceable, and never present Pactlio as a law firm or a substitute for a lawyer.
Reviewing a contract
Use pactlio_contracts_analyze with the pasted text (200–50,000 chars). Present the risk level, red flags, and questions to ask. Include the disclaimer.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 45 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A bd17858a8342
pactlio is a skill published in the GitHub repository Pactlio-ai/pactlio-mcp (0 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 705 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
specification-writing
A workflow for writing complete patent specifications from patent claims and an invention disclosure. It adapts the document to a chosen jurisdiction, such as the US, Europe, or China.
regulatory-research-fallback
Fallback workflow for regulatory research when web extraction tools fail on government PDFs.
x-scorecard
OpenSSF Scorecard for assessing open source project security. Check security best practices and compliance. Dependency: This is an x-cmd module. Install x-cmd first (see x-cmd skill for installation options). see x-cmd skill for installation.
memstack-business-gdpr
Use this skill when the user says 'GDPR', 'data protection', 'privacy compliance', 'DPA', 'DSAR', 'data subject request', 'cookie consent', 'privacy audit', 'CCPA', or asks 'do I need GDPR for this repo'. Scans the repository to detect what personal data is collected, classifies sensitivity, determines whether GDPR…
gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb
Für Gesellschaftsrechtliche Satzungen AGB Abgrenzung: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Prüfprodukt mit Risiko und nächstem Schritt. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: gesellschaftsrechtliche-satzungen-agb.
nda-review
Use when the user uploads or pastes a non-disclosure agreement and asks for review, redline, risk assessment, or a recommendation on whether to sign. Identifies missing standard protections, one-sided or unusual provisions, and operational issues; produces a structured report with severity ratings and citations to…