Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/painhardcore/pstack/principle-encode-lessons-in-structurenpx skills add painhardcore/pstack --skill principle-encode-lessons-in-structuregit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/painhardcore/pstackWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge for your README with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/painhardcore/pstack/principle-encode-lessons-in-structure)What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00049 | $0.00467 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00234 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00093 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00047 |
Grade A, and why
principle-encode-lessons-in-structure scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
92% identical to principle-encode-lessons-in-structure — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Encode Lessons in Structure
Encode recurring fixes in mechanisms (tools, code, metadata, automation) instead of textual instructions. Every error, human correction, and unexpected outcome is a learning signal. Capture it, route it, and close the loop.
Why: Textual instructions are easy to miss. They require the reader to notice, remember, and comply. Structural mechanisms (lint rules, metadata flags, runtime checks, automation scripts) enforce the rule without cooperation.
Pattern: When you catch yourself writing the same instruction a second time:
- Ask: can this be a lint rule, a metadata flag, a runtime check, or a script?
- If yes, encode it. Delete the instruction
- If no (genuinely requires judgment), make the instruction more prominent and add an example of the failure mode
Pick the strongest rung. When more than one mechanism would work, choose the strongest the situation allows (an unrepresentable state that cannot compile, then a lint or banned API that fails CI, then a canonical helper, then a runtime check), because agents copy whatever the surrounding code already does and a weaker guard becomes the next template.
Corollary: Don't paper over symptoms. If the fix is structural, ONLY use the structural fix. The instruction IS the symptom.
Feedback loop:
- Capture every correction. When the human intervenes or tests fail, decide if it's a one-off or a pattern.
- Route to the right layer. One-off -> brain note. Recurring fix -> skill or lint rule. Systemic issue -> principle.
- Close the loop. Don't just record. Apply now or create a concrete todo.
Anti-patterns:
- Acknowledging without recording ("I'll keep that in mind" does not persist)
- Recording without routing (a brain note about a lint rule that should exist is wasted unless the lint rule gets implemented)
- Fixing without generalizing (fixing one instance while leaving the recurring pattern intact)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 31 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A 9ab0e6d97998
principle-encode-lessons-in-structure is a skill published in the GitHub repository painhardcore/pstack (1 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 467 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 92% identical to principle-encode-lessons-in-structure, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-authoring
Author SKILL.md skills: frontmatter, validator limits, structure.
iflytek-hyper-tts
Use when user asks to synthesize speech, convert text to audio, or read text aloud. 讯飞超拟人语音合成 - 支持文本转语音、语音合成（发音人/语速/语调/音量/输出格式）。大模型语音合成技能。语音合成, 文字转语音, 超拟人, TTS.
iflytek-ocr-invoice
Use when user asks to recognize invoices, extract receipt data, or OCR bills and tickets. Recognize and extract structured data from invoices, receipts, and bills using iFlytek OCR API (科大讯飞票据识别). Supports VAT invoices, taxi receipts, train tickets, toll invoices, medical bills, bank receipts, and more.
iflytek-voiceclone-tts
Use when user asks to clone a voice, train a custom voice model, or synthesize speech with a cloned voice. iFlytek Voice Clone tts(声音复刻) — train a custom voice model from audio samples and synthesize speech with the cloned voice. Supports the full workflow: get training text → create task → upload audio → submit…
animated-sketch-diagram
生成"黑墨手绘涂鸦"风格的动画架构图/流程图：米色纸面、针管笔墨线、极淡水洗色块、简笔涂鸦图标、序号章、连线上的流动圆点动画、图标微动效。产出单文件自包含动画 HTML（SVG+CSS），可一键导出无缝循环 GIF。当用户想画架构图、流程图、信息图、技术示意图、对比图、pipeline/workflow 可视化，或提到"手绘风""涂鸦风""动图""animated diagram""GIF 架构图"时使用；即使用户没明说要动画，做技术概念科普配图时也应优先考虑本 skill。.
iflytek-pdf-image-ocr
AI-powered OCR service for images and PDF documents using iFlytek's advanced recognition APIs.