Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add paleo/alignfirst --skill alreviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paleo/alignfirstWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/paleo/alignfirst/alreview)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paleo/alignfirst/alreview"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paleo/alignfirst/alreview/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paleo/alignfirst/alreview"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paleo/alignfirst/alreview.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00114 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00046 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00023 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00011 |
Grade A, and why
alreview scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Follow the review protocol guide if it is already in context. Otherwise, run npx -y alignfirst guide review and follow it; the output includes the ticket directory and work file rules. Do not use your own plan mode.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines ef85d269b285
- 1mo ago First seen · 10 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A e0f0f39e709b
alreview is a skill published in the GitHub repository paleo/alignfirst (85 stars, last pushed today), licensed CC0-1.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 114 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Review code changes for bugs, security issues, performance problems, and style violations. Use when asked to review code, a PR, or recent changes.
independent-verification
Use when a task or milestone claims completion and must be verified before being marked done, when acting as a verifier sub-agent checking a producer's work, or when a "done" claim needs evidence. Triggers on "verify this task", "is this actually done", "acceptance check", "run verification", any completion claim, any…
pr
Draft a PR body from OMC's paper trail — the smallest visual that proves the change, evidence consumed from the verify protocol (never re-collected), reversibility from the ADR test on the diff, glossary language throughout.
memory-to-skill
Turn workflows from your MemSearch memory into reusable skills. Use when the user asks to make/create/extract/distill a skill from what they just did or from past work, review skill candidates, install a distilled skill, or 'turn this into a skill'. Manages MemSearch procedural-memory candidates under…
crit-story
Author a crit story and continue the interactive review loop only when the user explicitly invokes crit-story or directly asks you to generate a crit story. Do not infer this skill from generic review, PR, or diff-review requests.
plan-eng-review
Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when…