Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills --skill china-functional-safetygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/china-functional-safety)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/china-functional-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/china-functional-safety/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/china-functional-safety"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills/china-functional-safety.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00031 | $0.01709 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00855 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00342 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00171 |
Grade A, and why
china-functional-safety scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Functional Safety — China Standard
GB/T 34590-2022 道路车辆 功能安全(12部分)
标准信息
| 属性 | 值 |
|---|---|
| 标准编号 | GB/T 34590-2022 |
| 中文名称 | 道路车辆 功能安全 |
| 英文名称 | Road vehicles — Functional safety |
| 类别 | 国家推荐性标准 |
| 状态 | 已发布(2022年) |
| 等同标准 | ISO 26262:2018(IDT) |
| 推荐等级 | P1-强烈推荐 |
| 适用范围 | 乘用车及商用车电子电气系统功能安全全生命周期 |
标准结构(12部分)
GB/T 34590-2022 道路车辆 功能安全
├── 第1部分:术语 (Vocabulary)
├── 第2部分:功能安全管理 (Management of functional safety)
├── 第3部分:概念阶段 (Concept phase)
│ ├── 项目定义
│ ├── 危害分析和风险评估 (HARA)
│ └── 功能安全概念 (FSC)
├── 第4部分:产品开发:系统层面 (System level)
│ ├── 技术安全概念 (TSC)
│ ├── 系统设计
│ └── 安全验证与安全确认
├── 第5部分:产品开发:硬件层面 (Hardware level)
│ ├── 硬件安全度量
│ ├── 单点故障度量 (SPFM)
│ ├── 潜伏故障度量 (LFM)
│ └── 硬件架构度量 (PMHF)
├── 第6部分:产品开发:软件层面 (Software level)
│ ├── 软件安全需求
│ ├── 软件架构设计
│ ├── 软件单元设计与实现
│ └── 软件验证
├── 第7部分:生产、运行、服务和退役 (Production, operation, service, decommissioning)
├── 第8部分:支持过程 (Supporting processes)
│ ├── 配置管理
│ ├── 变更管理
│ ├── 验证
│ └── 文档管理
├── 第9部分:以汽车安全完整性等级为导向和以安全为导向的分析
│ ├── ASIL 分解
│ ├── 相关失效分析 (DFA)
│ ├── 安全分析方法 (FMEA, FTA, ETA)
│ └── 共因分析
├── 第10部分:GB/T 34590 指南 (Guideline)
├── 第11部分:半导体应用指南 (Semiconductor guideline)
└── 第12部分:摩托车适配 (Adaptation for motorcycles)
ASIL 等级体系
HARA 三维度评估
危害分析与风险评估 (HARA)
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
严重度 (Severity):
S0: 无伤害
S1: 轻度伤害(可能生存)
S2: 重度伤害(可能生存,高风险治疗)
S3: 致命伤害(危及生命/致命)
暴露率 (Exposure):
E0: 不可能
E1: 极低概率
E2: 低概率
E3: 中等概率
E4: 高概率(几乎在所有运行条件下)
可控性 (Controllability):
C0: 一般可控
C1: 简单可控(>99%驾驶员可控)
C2: 正常可控(>90%驾驶员可控)
C3: 难以控制或不可控(<90%驾驶员可控)
ASIL 确定矩阵:
S1+E2+C2 = QM
S1+E3+C3 = ASIL A
S2+E3+C2 = ASIL A
S2+E4+C3 = ASIL C
S3+E3+C3 = ASIL C
S3+E4+C2 = ASIL C
S3+E4+C3 = ASIL D
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
ASIL 分解规则(第9部分)
ASIL 分解原则(冗余元素独立性):
ASIL D = ASIL D(D) + QM(D) [单一元素]
ASIL D = ASIL C(D) + ASIL A(D) [两元素分解]
ASIL D = ASIL B(D) + ASIL B(D) [两元素分解]
ASIL C = ASIL B(C) + ASIL A(C) [两元素分解]
ASIL C = ASIL A(C) + ASIL A(C) + QM(C) [三元素分解]
注:(D)/(C)表示分解来源的ASIL等级
要求:分解后的元素必须满足独立性要求(共因分析)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 154 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 1bb08272187a
china-functional-safety is a skill published in the GitHub repository pangzhenying2025/hermes-automotive-skills (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 1,709 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
iso26262
ISO 26262 functional-safety expert that operates in two modes: (1) HARA / ASIL determination — enumerate hazardous events from item malfunctions × driving situations, rate Severity (S0–S3), Exposure (E0–E4), Controllability (C0–C3), look up ASIL from ISO 26262-3:2018 Table 4, and produce a HARA report with Safety…
automotive-syseng
When the user wants to analyze automotive requirements, check INCOSE/EARS compliance, review MISRA-C code, assess ADAS levels, or verify ISO 26262/AUTOSAR/SOTIF conformance. Also use when the user says 'check requirements', 'EARS check', 'INCOSE analysis', 'MISRA check', 'ASIL assessment', 'V-model check'…
automotive-expert
Expert-level automotive systems, connected vehicles, fleet management, telematics, ADAS, and automotive software. Use when the user mentions connected car, fleet, telematics, ADAS, or vehicle, or when the task involves Automotive Systems, Technologies, Standards and Protocols, or Fleet Management.
avionics-technician
Use when a task needs the judgment of an avionics technician — chasing an intermittent nav/comm or autopilot fault that "checks good" on the ground, deciding whether an avionics upgrade needs an STC or qualifies for field approval, verifying bonding resistance and wire-bundle separation on an install, cross-checking a…
blaster
Use when a task needs the judgment of a licensed blaster-in-charge — designing a bench or trench blast pattern, checking a shot against vibration/flyrock regulatory limits, sequencing detonator delays, handling a misfire, or reviewing explosives magazine storage and transport compliance.
boilermaker
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Boilermaker — qualifying or selecting a welding procedure for a pressure-boundary repair, deciding whether a defect is a code "repair" or an "alteration" under the National Board Inspection Code, sizing a tube-to-drum rolled joint expansion, reading radiographic or ultrasonic…