Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add panjose/Co-Scientist --skill hypothesis-ranking-pipelinegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/panjose/Co-ScientistWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/panjose/co-scientist/hypothesis-ranking-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/panjose/co-scientist/hypothesis-ranking-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/panjose/co-scientist/hypothesis-ranking-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/panjose/co-scientist/hypothesis-ranking-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/panjose/co-scientist/hypothesis-ranking-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.01951 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00975 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00390 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00195 |
Grade A, and why
hypothesis-ranking-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 94 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
hypothesis-ranking-pipeline
Goal:
- Update ranking artifacts for one reviewed hypothesis using canonical placement-opponent selection, ranked-frontier selection, tournament judgments, and Elo updates.
Inputs:
- candidate
hypotheses/<id>/HYPOTHESIS.json - current viable hypothesis frontier
- optional
state/PROXIMITY_GRAPH.json - current tournament artifacts
- numeric ranking settings from
state/RESOLVED_RUN_CONFIG.json
Outputs:
- updated
tournaments/*.json - updated candidate and opponent
hypotheses/<id>/HYPOTHESIS.jsonartifacts with Elo and match references - updated
state/PIPELINE_STATE.json - updated
state/CURRENT_STAGE.json
Sub-skills:
hypothesis-placement-tournamenthypothesis-ranked-tournamentranking-elo-update
Context Loading:
- Open
skills/shared-references/schema-index.md. - Read
packages/agent_contracts/hypothesis.pyand confirm the exactHypothesisContractshape before writing any touchedHYPOTHESIS.jsonartifact. - Read
packages/agent_contracts/ranking.pyand confirm the exactTournamentMatchContractplusHypothesisMatchupContractshapes. - Read
packages/agent_contracts/resolved_config.pyforplacement_match_countandtournament_top_k. - Read
packages/agent_contracts/pipeline_runtime.pybefore updatingstate/PIPELINE_STATE.jsonorstate/CURRENT_STAGE.json. - If
state/PROXIMITY_GRAPH.jsonexists, readpackages/agent_contracts/state.pyand load the exactProximityGraphContract. - Read
packages/agent_contracts/proximity.pybefore interpretingstate/proximity_receipts/<hypothesis_id>.jsonorstate/PROXIMITY_STATUS.json. - Treat a missing or candidate-incomplete proximity graph as a valid upstream state only when the candidate has a bridge receipt/status proving that the embedding provider was skipped, disabled, unavailable, invalid, or failed. Do not interpret graph absence as permission to fabricate similarity state.
Execution Contract:
- This pipeline skill may orchestrate LLM tournament judgments, but all frontier-selection mechanics must use the canonical deterministic helper surface from
tools. - Use
from tools import sync_pipeline_stage_artifactsas the canonical paired write surface for entering theRankingsubstage. - On entry, call
tools.sync_pipeline_stage_artifacts(run_dir, current_phase="Ranking", current_skill="hypothesis-ranking-pipeline"). - Use
from tools import select_placement_opponentsas the canonical placement-opponent selector whenstate/PROXIMITY_GRAPH.jsonis available. - Use
from tools import select_fallback_placement_opponentsonly for receipt-gated placement fallback when usable proximity state is unavailable. - Use
from tools import get_top_k_hypothesesto derive the canonical current top-k frontier. - Use
from tools import should_run_ranked_tournamentto decide whether the candidate must enter ranked play. - Use
from tools import select_ranked_opponentsto derive the canonical ranked-tournament opponents when ranked play is warranted. - The helper implementations live in
packages/agent_mechanics/top_k_select.py. - Use
ranking-elo-updateafter tournament winners are already decided. It is the canonical Elo and match-reference update step. - Apply the placement batch Elo update before ranked-top-k gating; ranked tournament eligibility must be computed from the post-placement frontier, not stale pre-placement ratings.
ranking-elo-updatemust close the batch by callingtools.apply_and_persist_elo_updates(...)before convergence or downstream routing reads the frontier again.- The ranking closeout helper updates touched canonical hypothesis artifacts without rewriting standalone
REVIEW/*.jsonstage artifacts and writes aRankingUpdateReceiptContract. - Match refs are not sufficient closeout proof; each completed placement or ranked batch must have a persisted ranking update receipt.
- Ranking closeout must use the receipt-writing helper exactly once per completed batch. If the same stable receipt already exists, treat the helper's returned persisted receipt as the closeout proof and do not reapply Elo deltas or append duplicate match refs.
- Do not replace the helper logic with ad hoc manual opponent choice when the canonical artifacts needed by the helpers are available.
- If
state/PROXIMITY_GRAPH.jsonis missing, invalid, or does not contain usable state for the candidate, first checkstate/proximity_receipts/<candidate_id>.jsonandstate/PROXIMITY_STATUS.json. - Receipt-gated placement fallback is allowed only when those bridge artifacts explicitly record a skipped, disabled, failed, or provider-unavailable proximity outcome for the candidate. If no such receipt/status exists, return to
hypothesis-proximity-updateinstead of choosing opponents manually. - When receipt-gated placement fallback is used, call
tools.select_fallback_placement_opponents(candidate, hypotheses, placement_match_count)and write an explicit trace/rationale that names the candidate receipt status and states that placement was not embedding-, proximity-, or similarity-informed.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 94 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 33e20e4f9afc
hypothesis-ranking-pipeline is a skill published in the GitHub repository panjose/Co-Scientist (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,951 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
figure-style
Publication-grade correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable scientific figures, not exploratory plots. Use for a figure that will ship in a report, paper, export, or kept artifact. Covers data fidelity, label economy, color threading, chart choice, layout, and render-then-verify QA without imposing a…
remote-compute-ssh
Evaluate and use SSH Remote Compute before choosing where to run GPU, high-memory, parallel, batch, model-inference, bioinformatics, or other long-running scientific work; supports short remote commands and asynchronous jobs with automatic harvest and analysis.
literature-review
Find, verify, and synthesize scientific literature — from "what's the seminal paper for X" through full multi-source reviews. Covers grounding claims in real retrieved sources, avoiding fabricated citations, handling retractions, and calibrating confidence to evidence strength.
scvi-tools
Probabilistic single-cell RNA-seq with scvi-tools — scVI for a batch-corrected latent space, scANVI for semi-supervised label transfer, and Bayesian differential expression. Reach for this skill to integrate scRNA-seq batches, embed cells for clustering, transfer annotations from a reference onto a query, or score…
self-awareness
Inspect Open Science's JavaScript control REPL, discover managed Project files, Sessions, and Agent Frames, and safely feature-gate host. calls with host.capabilities(). Use when an Agent needs to discover available host APIs, locate an Artifact or Upload Version, diagnose a Session, or read a Frame transcript in the…
openfold3
Structure prediction using OpenFold3, an open-weights PyTorch reproduction of AlphaFold3 from the AlQuraishi Lab. Use this skill when predicting protein/nucleic-acid/ligand complex structures with an Apache-2.0-licensed AF3 reimplementation.