Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Pantani/ableton-mind. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Pantani/ableton-mind/main/.claude/skills/usability-flow-audit/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pantani/ableton-mindWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantani/ableton-mind/usability-flow-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantani/ableton-mind/usability-flow-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pantani/ableton-mind/usability-flow-audit.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00242 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00121 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
usability-flow-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Usability Flow Audit
Use this skill to test whether users can install, diagnose and use ableton-mind without hidden knowledge.
Workflow
- Pick real personas: musician installing the bundle, developer using npm, MCP client user, contributor running tests.
- Trace each flow through README, docs, CLI and actual commands.
- Run safe parts of the flow. For unavailable Live/hardware steps, mark the exact prerequisite.
- Check that errors tell users what happened and what to do next.
- Check MCP tool and recipe ergonomics: names, schemas, defaults, verify/diff output and discoverability.
- Keep root docs English and localized docs under docs/pt.
Report Format
Write _workspace/quality-audit/usability-{N}.md with:
- Flow.
- Steps tested.
- Result.
- Friction or failure.
- Proposed copy/CLI/schema change.
- Verification step.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 28 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A d14c247b286b
usability-flow-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Pantani/ableton-mind (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 242 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa-test-planner
Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.
design-qa
Internal prototype QA helper. Use only after a Product Design prototype, URL-to-code build, or image-to-code build has a source visual target and a rendered implementation to compare before handoff. Do not use for broad UX critique, design critique, product audits, or flow reviews; route those user-facing requests to…
health
Runs a budget-aware agent-assisted engineering health audit for instruction/config drift, hooks/MCP, verifier surfaces, and AI maintainability. Use when users ask in any language to audit Claude, Codex, Pi, agent instructions, MCP or hooks, verifier coverage, or AI-maintainability drift. Not for debugging application…
chrome-cdp
Drive a headless Chrome over the Chrome DevTools Protocol (CDP) for browser QA — navigate, click, fill forms, read the DOM/accessibility tree, screenshot, and assert. Use whenever a task requires loading a web page and interacting with it like a user. Chrome is launched by a bash step (recipe below); this skill…
ui-craft-checks
Use this comprehensive gate for formal review, QA, launch handoff, exact-fidelity inspection, high-risk complex UI, or when the fast gate exposes a deeper craft problem. Ordinary single-screen work uses ui-design-executor and its bundled validator without loading this full matrix. Pair standalone artifacts with…
seed-verify-figma-mcp-transports
Run a Figma MCP tool over both the REST and WebSocket transports and diff the two answers, so a change to one path cannot silently drift from the other. Use after editing packages/mcp/src/tools.ts, src/tools-helpers.ts, or tools/figma-mcp/src/main/commands/. Also triggers on "verify both transports", "compare REST and…