Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to Pantani/ableton-mind. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Pantani/ableton-mind/main/.claude/skills/usability-flow-audit/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pantani/ableton-mindWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantani/ableton-mind/usability-flow-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantani/ableton-mind/usability-flow-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pantani/ableton-mind/usability-flow-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantani/ableton-mind/usability-flow-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pantani/ableton-mind/usability-flow-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00242 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00097 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00048 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
usability-flow-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Usability Flow Audit
Use this skill to test whether users can install, diagnose and use ableton-mind without hidden knowledge.
Workflow
- Pick real personas: musician installing the bundle, developer using npm, MCP client user, contributor running tests.
- Trace each flow through README, docs, CLI and actual commands.
- Run safe parts of the flow. For unavailable Live/hardware steps, mark the exact prerequisite.
- Check that errors tell users what happened and what to do next.
- Check MCP tool and recipe ergonomics: names, schemas, defaults, verify/diff output and discoverability.
- Keep root docs English and localized docs under docs/pt.
Report Format
Write _workspace/quality-audit/usability-{N}.md with:
- Flow.
- Steps tested.
- Result.
- Friction or failure.
- Proposed copy/CLI/schema change.
- Verification step.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A d14c247b286b
usability-flow-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository Pantani/ableton-mind (10 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 242 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
qa-test-planner
Generate comprehensive test plans, manual test cases, regression test suites, and bug reports for QA engineers. Includes Figma MCP integration for design validation.
design-qa
Internal prototype QA helper. Use only after a Product Design prototype, URL-to-code build, or image-to-code build has a source visual target and a rendered implementation to compare before handoff. Do not use for broad UX critique, design critique, product audits, or flow reviews; route those user-facing requests to…
health
Audits agent config, instruction drift, hooks or MCP, and AI maintainability. Use when Claude, Codex, or Pi setup looks wrong. Not for application bugs or PR review.
critique
Adversarial design critique of the current work. Render it, look at it, and argue for rejection. Run after the gates are green, never instead of them.
seed-verify-figma-mcp-transports
A verification tool for Figma MCP tools that runs the same request through REST and WebSocket connections and compares the answers. MCP is a way for an AI agent to call external tools; REST and WebSocket are two ways to communicate with a service.
visual-acceptance
A visual final-review method for user-interface changes. It checks the rendered result with repeatable screenshots, pixel values, computed styles, and CSS layering checks across themes.