Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pantheon-org/tekhne --skill goal-trackergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pantheon-org/tekhneWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/goal-tracker)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/goal-tracker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/goal-tracker/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/goal-tracker"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pantheon-org/tekhne/goal-tracker.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.01349 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00540 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00270 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00135 |
Grade A, and why
goal-tracker scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Goal Tracker
Write down the one thing this session is for, keep it honest as work lands, and answer "what's left" without reconstructing it from memory.
Mindset
An unevidenced status is worse than no status. A goal claiming an item is done, with nothing anyone can point at, turns an open question into a false answer and the reader stops checking. Trade convenience for provability everywhere.
Keep trust asymmetric. Close work done inside the repository yourself, since anyone can re-check it. Leave work that left the repository for its owner to close.
When to Use
- The user states a goal at session start.
- The project requires a goal for every conversation.
- The user asks "what's left", "what's outstanding", "are we done".
- Park an item, promote an overgrown goal, or close one out.
When Not to Use
- Work a plan file already drives. Track it there.
- A mechanical request with no end state worth recording.
- Deferred work that was never part of a goal. Use
create-context-fileinstead.
Core Rules
- Keep exactly one goal active per session. Replace the first or fold it in; never run two.
- Demand evidence before
done. Park unconfirmed outside work atawaiting. - File a follow-up the same turn you park an item, then delete its row.
- Record a promoted goal as
promoted. Never ascompleted.
Workflow
Run the clarity test first. Use socratic-method for a goal with no verifiable end state,
and guided-interview when its items hinge on an unmade choice. Otherwise draft it:
./scripts/goal.sh new "Rotate the exposed token and unblock Phase 1"
Pass --session <id> (or GOAL_SESSION) when conversations share the repository.
Check the draft with the user. Start work only once they confirm or correct it.
Set goal-status: in-progress on the first item to gain evidence. Write that evidence in the
same turn the item closes. Add a dated log line on every change, and save the file in that
turn where the next session reads it, such as the main branch. Keep discovered work as a
follow-up unless the end state is unreachable without it.
What ships with it
36 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- .audits/2026-10-02/Analysis.md 480 B
- .audits/2026-10-02/audit.json 542 B
- .audits/2026-10-02/Remediation.md 1.3 KB
- .audits/2026-10-12/Analysis.md 630 B
- .audits/2026-10-12/audit.json 777 B
- .audits/2026-10-12/Remediation.md 2.7 KB
- assets/templates/goal.yaml 5.3 KB
- CHANGELOG.md 5.0 KB
- evals/instructions.json 5.8 KB
- evals/scenario-1/capability.txt 107 B
- evals/scenario-1/criteria.json 2.2 KB
- evals/scenario-1/task.md 1.5 KB
- evals/scenario-2/capability.txt 122 B
- evals/scenario-2/criteria.json 2.2 KB
- evals/scenario-2/task.md 2.0 KB
- evals/scenario-3/capability.txt 117 B
- evals/scenario-3/criteria.json 2.0 KB
- evals/scenario-3/task.md 1.9 KB
- evals/scenario-4/capability.txt 95 B
- evals/scenario-4/criteria.json 2.2 KB
- evals/scenario-4/task.md 2.2 KB
- evals/scenario-5/capability.txt 90 B
- evals/scenario-5/criteria.json 1.4 KB
- evals/scenario-5/task.md 1.2 KB
- evals/scenario-6/capability.txt 99 B
- evals/scenario-6/criteria.json 1.3 KB
- evals/scenario-6/task.md 1.2 KB
- evals/scenario-7/capability.txt 85 B
- evals/scenario-7/criteria.json 980 B
- evals/scenario-7/task.md 1002 B
- evals/summary.json 155 B
- references/clarity-test.md 2.8 KB
- references/evidence.md 2.7 KB
- references/file-shape.md 4.6 KB
- references/promotion.md 2.6 KB
- scripts/goal.sh 11 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed 8a1ed9e53e60
- 17d ago Changed · +5 lines 92cceb0e88de
- 1mo ago First seen · 133 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A af73639753b7
goal-tracker is a skill published in the GitHub repository pantheon-org/tekhne (10 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 1,349 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-15.
Other skills, from other repositories
feature-prioritisation
Aplica marcos de priorización (RICE, MoSCoW, Kano, ICE, Opportunity Scoring) para clasificar características e items del backlog. Úsalo cuando se te pida priorizar características, clasificar un backlog, decidir qué construir a continuación, o evaluar compensaciones entre ideas competidoras. Produce una lista de…
design-handoff-brief
Transform feature briefs into structured design briefs that give designers the context they need before opening Figma. Use when asked to write a design brief, create a design handoff, brief a designer on a new feature, or translate a PRD into design requirements. Produces a brief with user goal, emotional context…
factory-collect
Experimental workflow for collecting and triaging product feedback, product telemetry, runtime errors, and issue reports. Use when scanning configured signal sources and applying separate fix, reply, or close rules.
factory-human-digest
Experimental workflow for summarizing work that still needs human judgment across configured pull requests, issues, feedback, errors, and delivery signals. Use for a human decision queue or bounded review.
factory
Experimental workflow for configuring an autonomous software delivery factory. Use when choosing feedback sources, schedules, worktree behavior, autonomy gates, or host automations.
factory-recover
Experimental workflow for finding and resuming interrupted coding runs. Use after an agent host restart or an interrupted automation.