first-task

First task

Use this workflow only for the onboarding task that invokes /first-task, including later replies and approval wakes on that same task. Do not apply it to the agent's other tasks just because this skill is installed. Follow it without announcing the first-task skill in routine messages, cards, or documents. Say "I'm doing X," not "I'm using the first-task skill to do X," and explain next steps directly. This is a wording preference: answer truthfully if the user asks about the workflow, and always disclose relevant permissions, security implications, and execution actions.

This is the user's first task in Paperclip. Your job is to understand what they want and propose a path forward. A greeting and an opening question card were already posted for you; the card offered two choices: "Interview me and propose a plan and an agent team to execute it." (option interview) or "I have a task in mind" (option task, with a text field). You are running because the user answered that card (the answer is in your wake payload) or wrote a message instead of answering. Don't re-introduce yourself and don't post the opening card again.

Work in this order.

1. Take the path the user picked.

   • interview → ask the user 3–4 questions in one Paperclip question card (request_human_input with interactionKind: "questions" when available, otherwise the ask_user_questions API) that pin down what their organization does, what they want to achieve first, any constraints (time, budget, tools), and what "done" looks like. Don't guess; ask. Don't post anything else before the card. The answers lead to the plan-and-team path in step 2.

   • task → the text they typed is the task. If it is clear enough to propose on, go straight to step 2. If not, reply by asking 2–3 questions specific to their message (concrete goal, constraints, what "done" looks like), then go to step 2.

   • If they wrote a message instead of answering the card, treat the message as the task path.

2. Propose, then wait for acceptance.

   • Choose the proposal form from the user’s request first: an explicit plan request or the interview path always requires a saved plan, even when the task description says confirmation.
   • If they want a plan, save a plan document on this onboarding task describing the goal, scope, steps, proposed team, and what done means. Post one request_checkbox_confirmation targeting the saved plan revision. A card or thread message alone is not a saved plan. This applies to explicit plan requests regardless of the single-task proposal mode. Proposing a team does not authorize hiring it.
   • If they want one thing done, propose exactly one child task with a clear outcome and scope. Ask them to accept it before creating the child. Do not produce the requested finished work inside the proposal, even when it is quick to do.
   • For a single-task proposal, follow the Single-task proposal mode saved in the task description: confirmation means one request_confirmation card describing the child task, without a plan document; plan means save a short plan document describing that same child task and post one request_checkbox_confirmation targeting its saved revision.
   • Keep this task in_review while waiting. You may clarify, research for planning, and save or revise a plan/proposal before acceptance. Do not hire, create execution tasks, perform the deliverable, save finished output, or claim completion yet.

3. Interpret the next reply against the latest proposal.

   • Acceptance is an accepted confirmation card or an explicit conversational reply agreeing to the proposal. The opening answer, a clear request, and answers to clarification questions supply scope; they are not acceptance of a proposal you have not yet made.
   • When acceptance or rejection arrives in chat, persist it on the corresponding pending confirmation before hiring, creating a child, executing, or closing this task. Read this task's interactions and comments, then POST /api/issues/{issueId}/interactions/{interactionId}/resolve-from-comment with { "commentId": "<user-message-id>", "decision": "accept" } (or "reject" and the user's reason). Native runners use call_api. For a checkbox card, include selectedOptionIds for the user's actual selection; never infer acceptance from defaults. Wait for the saved accepted/rejected result. Retry an interrupted write using the same message and decision; inspect a conflicting result instead of proceeding. Do not tell the user to return to the card after answering in chat.
   • An ambiguous reply with multiple pending proposals is not permission to resolve them all. Ask which proposal or options they mean. A card already answered through the UI needs no second resolution. Forms, governed actions, and human-only policies keep their existing response rules.
   • A clarification answer means update the proposal if needed and ask for acceptance. A requested revision supersedes the old scope: revise the proposal and wait for acceptance of the revised version.
   • If they reject the proposal, acknowledge and stop. Do not execute it. You may close the onboarding task after acknowledging the rejection; do not describe rejected work as completed.