paperclip: Skill for Codex

.agents/skills/maintain-verification-skill/SKILL.md

maintain-verification-skill is a skill for Codex from paperclipai/paperclip. It costs 51 tokens per session (1,587 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A maintenance guide for keeping a project's verification instructions and maps of product and agent access aligned with the current code. It distinguishes source inspection from evidence gathered by running the application.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit or update verification skills, feature maps, and agent-access maps, and to report whether requested coverage is clean, changed, or blocked.
Why use it?
It prevents verification documents from claiming coverage that has not been tested, especially where an API, a named actor, and a real agent path are different things. It also makes remaining gaps explicit.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: mentions subagents; installed under .agents/ (shared by several agents).

This is paperclipai/paperclip's own configuration. It tells Codex how to work on paperclip itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything paperclip configures →

About the project

Paperclip is a Node.js server and React application for coordinating AI agents as a business team, with goals, organizational roles, budgets, governance, and work tracking in one interface. It is used by people managing multiple agents or autonomous agent organizations across tools such as OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex, and Cursor. The catalogue includes skills, agents, an MCP add-on, and an instruction for working with Paperclip.

paperclipai/paperclip · 107,044 stars · on GitHub · paperclip.ing

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to paperclipai/paperclip. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paperclipai/paperclip/master/.agents/skills/maintain-verification-skill/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for maintain-verification-skill

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paperclipai/paperclip/maintain-verification-skill/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/paperclipai/paperclip/maintain-verification-skill)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paperclipai/paperclip/maintain-verification-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paperclipai/paperclip/maintain-verification-skill/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for maintain-verification-skill

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paperclipai/paperclip/maintain-verification-skill"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paperclipai/paperclip/maintain-verification-skill.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 51 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,587 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00051 $0.01587
Opus 5.5 $0.00020 $0.00635
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00010 $0.00317
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00159

Measured 11d ago against content hash 188080b393cf, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

maintain-verification-skill scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/skills/maintain-verification-skill/SKILL.md · 130 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 130 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Maintain a verification skill and its maps

Keep user journeys and agent access aligned with the app. For Paperclip, read the map contract, the feature index, and the agent access index. These are sibling maps under maps/, with the same area filenames and capability IDs. Preserve Poteto's product format. Agent companions follow the shared contract; they do not duplicate user recipes.

An API endpoint, an OpenAPI actor label, a declared scenario tool and an admitted production agent path are different evidence. Verify which permitted agent surface can actually express an operation. Track source review, operation review and executed proof separately. A source-only baseline is useful, but cannot certify complete coverage or live behavior.

Outcomes

Pick one and report source scope, live scope and remaining gaps separately:

  • clean — the requested scope got source and live coverage, with no corrections.
  • changed — proven skill/map/check corrections are ready to review; name any access gaps or unexecuted coverage that remains.
  • blocked — requested coverage or a proven correction could not finish; name the unmet prerequisite and evidence captured so far.

A targeted audit covers its named areas; do not present it as a full pass. A full pass reads every area from source and exercises every reachable feature, plus relevant permitted-agent and denial paths. Report unreachable prerequisites and not-run operations rather than silently reducing the scope.

Edit scope

For Paperclip, edit the target verification skill, these maintenance instructions when needed, maps/, and the map-specific structural check scripts/check-maps.mjs / scripts/check-maps.test.mjs. Fix references to those maps in contributor docs or skill instructions when their locations/IDs change. Keep the maps in maps/{feature-map,agent-access-map}/, outside skill directories.

Read the full file on GitHub · 130 lines

Files

What ships with it

2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago Changed · +5 lines 188080b393cf
  2. 12d ago First seen · 125 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A fa85626c7c61

Subscribe to this mod's changes

maintain-verification-skill is a skill published in the GitHub repository paperclipai/paperclip (107,044 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 1,587 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-13.