Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add param087/agent-ml-skills --skill data-cleaninggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/param087/agent-ml-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/data-cleaning)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/data-cleaning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/data-cleaning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/data-cleaning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/data-cleaning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00750 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00300 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
data-cleaning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 75 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Data Cleaning
Overview
Cleaning turns raw data into a consistent, model-ready table without leaking information from the future or the test set. The golden rule: every statistic used to clean (means, medians, modes, bounds, category maps) must be learned from the training split only, then applied to validation/test.
When to use
- Raw data has nulls, duplicates, mixed types, or junk categories.
- Before feature-engineering and modeling.
- After EDA flagged specific quality issues.
Workflow
- Deduplicate — exact and key-based duplicates. Decide which to keep (latest timestamp, highest completeness).
- Fix types — parse dates, cast numerics stored as strings, normalize booleans.
- Standardize categoricals — trim whitespace, unify case, map synonyms ("US"/"USA"/"United States").
- Handle missing values — choose per-column strategy (see below).
- Treat outliers — cap/winsorize or flag; never blindly delete.
- Validate — assert schema, ranges, and row counts after each step.
Missing-value strategy
| Situation | Strategy |
|---|---|
| Numeric, MCAR, small % | Median impute (robust to skew) |
| Numeric, informative missingness | Impute + add was_missing indicator |
| Categorical | Impute with "Missing" as its own category |
| Time series | Forward/backward fill within group |
| >50% missing | Consider dropping the column |
Reference snippet (leakage-safe)
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
from sklearn.impute import SimpleImputer
X_train, X_test, y_train, y_test = train_test_split(
X, y, test_size=0.2, random_state=42, stratify=y
)
# Fit imputers on TRAIN ONLY
num_imputer = SimpleImputer(strategy="median").fit(X_train[num_cols])
X_train[num_cols] = num_imputer.transform(X_train[num_cols])
X_test[num_cols] = num_imputer.transform(X_test[num_cols]) # reuse train stats
Prefer doing this inside a Pipeline/ColumnTransformer (see the sklearn-pipelines skill) so leakage is impossible by construction.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 75 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A d658c800c8c3
data-cleaning is a skill published in the GitHub repository param087/agent-ml-skills (13 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 750 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
data-cleaning compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| data-cleaningparam087/agent-ml-skills | Skill | 13 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code, Codex |
| spark-training-gotchaswshobson/agents | Skill | 42k | yesterday | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code |
| 9router-sttdecolua/9router | Skill | 32k | 9d ago | MIT | A | 63 | Claude Code, Codex |
| 9routerdecolua/9router | Skill | 32k | 9d ago | MIT | A | 84 | Claude Code, Codex |
| 9router-embeddingsdecolua/9router | Skill | 32k | 9d ago | MIT | A | 66 | Claude Code, Codex |
| dashscopecalesthio/OpenMontage | Skill | 77k | 3d ago | AGPL-3.0 | A | 93 | Claude Code, Codex |
| ultralytics-platformfcakyon/claude-codex-settings | Skill | 1.2k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 135 | Claude Code |