Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add param087/agent-ml-skills --skill experiment-trackinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/param087/agent-ml-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/experiment-tracking)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/experiment-tracking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/experiment-tracking/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/experiment-tracking"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/param087/agent-ml-skills/experiment-tracking.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00042 | $0.00684 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00274 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00137 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00068 |
Grade A, and why
experiment-tracking scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Runs shell commandslowCapability
Expected in a hook, worth knowing in a rule or an instructions file.
sha = subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-parse", "HEAD"]).decode().strip() How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 74 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Experiment Tracking
Overview
Untracked experiments are unreproducible experiments. If you can't answer "which data + code + hyperparameters produced this metric?", you don't have a result — you have a number. This skill standardizes what to log and how.
When to use
- Running more than one model/config.
- Comparing experiments or sharing results with a team.
- Preparing a model for promotion to staging/production.
What to always log
| Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Params | hyperparameters, model arch, seed, data version/hash |
| Metrics | train/val loss per epoch, final test metrics, timing |
| Artifacts | model checkpoint, config file, plots, confusion matrix |
| Code state | git commit SHA, dirty flag, dependency lockfile |
| Environment | Python/CUDA version, hardware |
MLflow pattern
import mlflow, subprocess
mlflow.set_experiment("churn-classifier")
sha = subprocess.check_output(["git", "rev-parse", "HEAD"]).decode().strip()
with mlflow.start_run(run_name="hgb-baseline"):
mlflow.log_params({"model": "HGB", "lr": 0.1, "seed": 42, "data_v": "2026-06-01"})
mlflow.set_tag("git_sha", sha)
for epoch, loss in enumerate(history):
mlflow.log_metric("val_loss", loss, step=epoch)
mlflow.log_metric("test_auc", test_auc)
mlflow.sklearn.log_model(model, "model")
mlflow.log_artifact("confusion_matrix.png")
Weights & Biases pattern
import wandb
wandb.init(project="churn", config={"lr": 3e-4, "seed": 42})
for epoch in range(epochs):
wandb.log({"val_loss": val_loss, "epoch": epoch})
wandb.log({"test_auc": test_auc})
wandb.finish()
Run hygiene
- One run = one config. Don't mutate params mid-run.
- Name runs meaningfully (
hgb-lr0.1-seed42), and tag by experiment goal. - Log the data version, not just the code — data drift silently invalidates comparisons.
- Promote a vetted run to the model registry with a stage (
Staging/Production) rather than copying files around.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 74 lines · 42 tokens per session scan A 9d1dbd82c7c5
experiment-tracking is a skill published in the GitHub repository param087/agent-ml-skills (13 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 42 tokens to every session and 684 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (runs shell commands). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
experiment-tracking compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| experiment-trackingparam087/agent-ml-skills | Skill | 13 | 5mo ago | MIT | A | 42 | Claude Code, Codex |
| stock-data-fetchrealnaka/alphaloop | Skill | 20 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 62 | Claude Code, Codex |
| x-tweet-by-conversationbrowser-act/skills | Skill | 6.3k | 2d ago | MIT | A | 218 | Claude Code, Codex |
| oma-scholarfirst-fluke/oh-my-agent | Skill | 1.4k | yesterday | MIT | A | 30 | Claude Code |
| monorepo-managementwshobson/agents | Skill | 42k | yesterday | MIT | C | 54 | Claude Code |
| render-3d-product-showcasegooseworks-ai/goose-skills | Skill | 1.3k | 10d ago | MIT | A | 159 | Claude Code, Codex |
| render-airdrop-carouselgooseworks-ai/goose-skills | Skill | 1.3k | 10d ago | MIT | A | 207 | Claude Code, Codex |