implement_plan_micro

implement_plan_micro is a skill for Claude Code from parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3. It costs 14 tokens per session (1,451 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A formal workflow for coordinating multi-phase implementation work using logical rules about evidence, questions, obligations, timing, and completed actions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to specify and verify plan execution, handoffs, validation, and decisions about retrying, continuing, or asking for input.
Why use it?
It provides a structured way to reason about whether work is justified, what remains unclear, and whether a phase is ready to continue.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

not rated 3.9krepo +2 7mo ago A scan Socket: passSnyk: passSkillSpector: pass 14 tokens original MIT

Good fit Use it to specify and verify plan execution, handoffs, validation, and decisions about retrying, continuing, or asking for input.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/implement_plan_micro
About the project

Continuous-Claude-v3 is a Claude Code development environment that preserves working context between sessions, coordinates specialized agents, and stores project knowledge through ledgers, handoffs, and analysis tools. It is for people using Claude Code on ongoing or complex software work. Its catalogue entries are the skills, agents, hooks, plugin, and setting that provide its workflows and orchestration.

parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 · 3,938 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 --skill implement_plan_micro
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for implement_plan_micro

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/implement_plan_micro/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/implement_plan_micro)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/implement_plan_micro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/implement_plan_micro/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for implement_plan_micro

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/implement_plan_micro"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parcadei/continuous-claude-v3/implement_plan_micro.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 14 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,451 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • Socket pass 15 Feb 2026
  • Snyk pass 15 Feb 2026
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00014 $0.01451
Opus 5 $0.00007 $0.00726
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00290
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00145

Measured 9d ago against content hash 403aceaa084d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

implement_plan_micro scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/implement_plan_micro/SKILL.md · 214 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 214 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Formal Specification

Multimodal Logic Integration

Five modal logics via fusion with bridge principles:

  • JL: Justification Logic - evidence-backed claims
  • IEL: Inferential Erotetic Logic - question handling
  • TEL: Temporal Epistemic Logic - phase sequencing
  • SDL: Standard Deontic Logic - obligations/permissions
  • DEL: Dynamic Epistemic Logic - action modalities

Justification Logic (JL)

# Justification terms
[h]:context(task_n)                    # Handoff h justifies task context
[v]:verified(phase_n)                  # Verification v justifies completion
[p]:plan(tasks)                        # Plan p justifies task list

# Evidence production
[read(f)]exists e. [e]:content(f)
[verify(c)]exists v. [v]:pass(c) | [v]:fail(c)

# Handoff chain: evidence propagates
[h_n]:complete(task_n) -> [h_{n+1}]:context(task_{n+1})
proceed(task) <-> exists h. [h]:validated

Inferential Erotetic Logic (IEL)

# Mode and blocker questions
?{direct, orchestration}               # Mode selection
?{continue, retry, ask_user}           # Blocker resolution
mismatch(plan, reality) -> ?{how_proceed}
no_validation -> ?{run_validation_first}

Temporal Epistemic Logic (TEL)

# File reading constraints
[](mentioned(f) -> <>read_fully(f))           # Eventually read
[](mentioned(f) -> not spawn U read_fully(f)) # No spawn until read
[](partial_read(f) -> false)                  # Partial reads forbidden

# Phase sequencing
[](phase(n) -> P(phase(n-1) & verified(n-1))) # Verified before next
[](automated_pass -> <>manual_verify)         # Automated gates manual
[](manual_pass(n) -> <>phase(n+1))            # Manual gates next phase

# Handoff persistence
[](handoff_created(h) -> []exists_on_disk(h)) # Survives compaction

# Termination
<>(all_complete | abandoned)

Standard Deontic Logic (SDL)

# Reading obligations
O(read_fully(plan))
O(read_fully(f)) <- mentioned_in_plan(f)
O(check_existing_checkmarks)
F(partial_read)

# Verification obligations
O(run_automated) <- impl_complete
O(pause_for_manual) <- automated_pass
O(present_manual_checklist)
F(checkoff_manual) <- not user_confirmed

# Mode selection
O(orchestration) <- tasks >= 4
P(direct) <- tasks <= 3
O(respect_user_preference)

# Orchestration obligations
O(read_previous_handoff) <- exists_handoff(task_{n-1})
O(create_handoff) <- agent_completes
O(update_ledger) <- task_complete
F(batch_tasks)                                # One agent per task
F(proceed_on_mismatch) <- not user_guidance

Read the full file on GitHub · 214 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 214 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 403aceaa084d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

implement_plan_micro is a skill published in the GitHub repository parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3 (3,938 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 1,451 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

fizzy-workflow

Use for guided Fizzy.do workflows: "set up Fizzy", "configure Fizzy for this project", "sync my work to Fizzy", "review my Fizzy progress", "end of session cleanup". Provides step-by-step guidance for common operations.

keskinonur/claude-plugin-fizzy · 57 tokens

make-skill

Use when creating, improving, comparing, evaluating, reviewing or packaging Agent Skills following the agentskills.io specification. Also use when deciding whether a skill is the right solution vs MCP servers, Claude Rules Files, CLAUDE.md or AGENTS.md. Handles SKILL.md authoring, frontmatter optimization, description…

sergeyklay/.agents · 84 tokens

test-ts

Write, review, and run TypeScript/React tests for this Next.js 16 App Router project. Use whenever writing or modifying .test.ts or .test.tsx files, adding test coverage to components, hooks, Server Actions, or utilities, setting up Vitest configuration, or asked about testing strategy. Covers Vitest (the project's…

sergeyklay/.agents · 139 tokens

isolate-cli

Run a third-party CLI as a subprocess without leaking into it or leaving state on the host, and prove both. Use when a script or skill shells out to an external tool, when a run must leave no trace outside the repository, when private input (a diff, a prompt, a credential) must not reach the tool's session log, when a…

sergeyklay/.agents · 208 tokens

check-dependabot

Validate a Dependabot configuration against the published JSON Schema and audit its groups against the repository's real dependency manifests. Use when creating or rewriting .github/dependabot.yml, when adding or reorganising groups, ignore or exclude-patterns, when a dependency lands in the wrong grouped PR or keeps…

sergeyklay/.agents · 163 tokens

review-impl

Review implementation changes for a given task against architectural standards. Use when reviewing a PR, evaluating recently committed code, assessing whether implementation changes are correct and architecturally sound, or when asked to 'review my changes', 'check this implementation', 'review what I built', 'is this…

sergeyklay/.agents · 155 tokens