ContinuousClaudeV4.7: Skill for Claude Code

.claude/skills/autonomous-research/SKILL.md

autonomous-research is a skill for Claude Code from parcadei/ContinuousClaudeV4.7. It costs 20 tokens per session (2,102 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A structured process for researching questions through repeated cycles of planning, delegated investigation, checking results, and refining ideas. It tracks hypotheses, confidence, and research sessions.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to break down focused, exploratory, or comparison-based research questions, assign investigation to workers, combine their findings, and decide whether more iterations are needed.
Why use it?
It prevents research from becoming an unstructured pile of notes or exhausting one context window. It also makes clear when the evidence is strong enough to stop.

Skill for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: user-invocable in frontmatter.

This is parcadei/ContinuousClaudeV4.7's own configuration. It tells Claude Code how to work on ContinuousClaudeV4.7 itself, so it is not a mod to install elsewhere. Copy it as a starting point and replace the rules that are about this project. Everything ContinuousClaudeV4.7 configures →

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to parcadei/ContinuousClaudeV4.7. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/parcadei/ContinuousClaudeV4.7/main/.claude/skills/autonomous-research/SKILL.md
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parcadei/ContinuousClaudeV4.7

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for autonomous-research

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parcadei/continuousclaudev4.7/autonomous-research.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/parcadei/continuousclaudev4.7/autonomous-research)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parcadei/continuousclaudev4.7/autonomous-research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parcadei/continuousclaudev4.7/autonomous-research.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,102 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.02102
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.01051
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00420
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00210

Measured 8d ago against content hash 34ea0c3e7eb8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

autonomous-research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/skills/autonomous-research/SKILL.md · 213 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 213 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Orchestrate. Never research directly. Workers research inside Ouros; you plan, decompose, delegate, synthesize. Carry: hypothesis status, confidence scores, iteration number, ouros session names. No web searches yourself. Workers share state through Ouros sessions — not through your context window.

Pipeline: ASSESS → PLAN → PREPARE → EXECUTE → VALIDATE → EVOLVE → (loop to PLAN) Terminates when: all hypotheses confidence >= 0.8, context budget >= 75%, or user stops.

ASSESS

Read research question. Classify scope: focused — single question, 1-3 hypotheses, 2-3 iterations exploratory — broad topic, 5+ hypotheses, open-ended comparative — N alternatives to evaluate, structured comparison Estimate iteration budget: focused ~3, exploratory ~6, comparative ~4. Check available tools: ouros harness, exa, nia, bloks. Create ouros session name: {topic-slug} (e.g., "attention-scale", "auth-patterns").

PLAN

Hypothesis contract first — what would "understanding this" look like?

research_contract.json:

{ "question": "How do attention patterns change with model scale?", "scope": "exploratory", "iteration": 1, "ouros_session": "attention-scale", "hypotheses": [ {"id": "H-001", "text": "Attention head specialization increases with scale", "confidence": 0, "status": "pending", "sources": 0, "depends": [], "worker": null} ], "accumulated_findings": [], "iterations_completed": 0 }

Confidence: 0 (unknown) → 0.3 (speculative) → 0.6 (supported) → 0.9 (well-established). Status: pending, researching, supported, refuted, inconclusive, superseded.

On iteration 2+: read EVOLVE output. Add new hypotheses from workers' new_questions. Supersede refuted hypotheses. Carry all findings forward.

PREMORTEM

Bias check: confirmation bias — only searching for supporting evidence? source bias — over-relying on one source type? blind spots — obvious sub-questions not covered? Present to user. BLOCK on blind spots, WARN on bias, PASS otherwise.

PREPARE

Front-load what's already known:

BLOKS_CONTEXT=$(bloks context .) BLOKS_CARDS=$(bloks search {topic keywords}) PRIOR_VARS=$(python tools/ouros_harness.py --session {topic} --list-vars) # iteration 2+

On iteration 1: mostly empty. Workers discover. On iteration 2+: Ouros session has accumulated variables from prior iterations. Workers --load the session and build on prior state.

EXECUTE

Workers research INSIDE Ouros. Same contract pattern as /autonomous — worker does the work, orchestrator just provides hypothesis + context + where to report.

Worker prompt — structured JSON, same shape as /autonomous:

{ "role": "research", "hypothesis": {"id": "H-001", "text": "Attention head specialization increases with scale"}, "context": { "bloks_context": "{verbatim bloks output}", "bloks_cards": [], "prior_findings": "{accumulated_findings from research_contract.json}", "available_tools": "exa_search, nia_universal, nia_search, nia_web, llm_call, agent_call, read_file, write_file" }, "bounds": { "ouros_session": "attention-scale", "ouros_storage": "continuum/research/attention-scale", "ouros_load": false, "ouros_fork": "attention-scale-H001", "max_sources": 5, "source_types": ["arxiv", "official_docs", "reference_impl"], "artifact_path": "continuum/research/attention-scale/artifacts/H-001-iter1.md" }, "output": "continuum/research/attention-scale/reports/H-001-iter1.json" }

bounds.ouros_load: true on iteration 2+ (worker resumes session, sees prior variables). bounds.ouros_fork: set when parallel workers need independent variable space.

Worker flow (the worker decides HOW to research — orchestrator just says WHAT):

  1. Write a Python research program (worker chooses search queries, synthesis approach)
  2. Run it: python tools/ouros_harness.py --file /tmp/{program}.py --session {session} --storage {storage} Add --load if bounds.ouros_load is true. Add --fork {name} if bounds.ouros_fork is set.
  3. Inside Ouros: exa_search, nia_search, llm_call etc. — results in REPL heap, not in context
  4. Program writes compact artifact to bounds.artifact_path
  5. Worker reads artifact, writes report JSON to output path

Read the full file on GitHub · 213 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 8d ago First seen · 213 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 34ea0c3e7eb8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

autonomous-research is a skill published in the GitHub repository parcadei/ContinuousClaudeV4.7 (48 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 2,102 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

next-partial-prefetching-adoption

Turn on Partial Prefetching in a Next.js app and work through the insights it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable or adopt Partial Prefetching, flip the partialPrefetching flag, opt routes in with export const prefetch = 'partial', audit Link prefetch={true} behavior, preserve existing prefetched UI with…

vercel/next.js · 103 tokens

chronicle

Analyze Copilot session history for standup reports, usage tips, session search, and session reindexing. Use when the user asks for a standup, daily summary, usage tips, workflow recommendations, wants to search or find past sessions by keyword/file/PR, wants to reindex their session store, or asks about deleting…

microsoft/vscode · 72 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens