Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup --skill e2e-rungit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup/e2e-run)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup/e2e-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup/e2e-run/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup/e2e-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup/e2e-run.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00053 | $0.00748 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00021 | $0.00299 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
e2e-run scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 106 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
e2e-run - Smart E2E Test Runner
Run E2E tests with automatic project detection and optimized wait strategies.
Usage
/e2e-run <target> # Run tests for target
/e2e-run admin-tests # Exact project match
/e2e-run admin # Fuzzy match → admin-tests
/e2e-run creator-detail # File match → detects project from path
Project Auto-Detection
Read apps/web/e2e/e2e-projects.json to detect the correct --project flag:
- Exact match: Input matches project name → use directly
- Alias match: Input matches an alias → resolve to project
- Path match: Input is a file/folder → find project by testMatch pattern
- Default: Use
chromiumfor unknown inputs
Execution Steps
Step 1: Detect Project
# Read config
cat apps/web/e2e/e2e-projects.json
Determine --project=<detected> based on input.
Step 2: Pre-flight Check
# Check DB connections (avoid pool exhaustion)
docker exec -i cursos-postgres psql -U postgres -c \
"SELECT count(*) FROM pg_stat_activity WHERE datname = 'cursos';" 2>/dev/null || echo "0"
If count > 80: docker restart cursos-postgres && sleep 5
Step 3: Execute Tests
pnpm test:e2e --project=<detected> --reporter=list 2>&1 | tee /tmp/e2e-run-output.txt
Step 4: Generate Structured Output
After execution, create apps/web/e2e-run-result.yaml:
executed_at: <ISO8601>
project: <detected>
target: <original-input>
duration_seconds: <time>
total: <count>
passed: <count>
failed: <count>
failures:
- test: "<file>:<line>"
title: "<test title>"
error_summary: "<first line of error>"
error_context: "<path to error-context.md>"
category: "<auto-detected category>"
Category Auto-Detection
Read apps/web/e2e/e2e-categories.json and match error patterns:
"page.goto: 404" → missing-route
"locator.click: timeout" → missing-element
"networkidle" + "403" → timeout-403
"response.toBeOK" → api-error
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 53 tokens per session scan A efa273789856
e2e-run is a skill published in the GitHub repository parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup (1 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 53 tokens to every session and 748 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
proof-e2e
Build E2E test specs for critical user journeys — Playwright or Cypress, page objects, setup/teardown, CI config. Use when asked to "write E2E tests", "end-to-end testing", "browser tests", "UI tests", or "Playwright tests".
e2e-testing
End-to-end testing for Falcon Foundry apps using Playwright and @crowdstrike/foundry-playwright. TRIGGER when user asks to "add e2e tests", "add playwright tests", "write end-to-end tests", "test my app", or mentions "e2e", "playwright", or "end-to-end" in the context of testing a Foundry app. DO NOT TRIGGER during…
browser-validator
Automatically validate implementations in real browsers after code is written or when user says "test this", "test what you built in the browser", "check it in a real browser", or "validate at the breakpoints". Uses Chrome DevTools MCP to test responsive breakpoints (320px, 768px, 1024px), check accessibility…
test-scaffolding
Automatically generate test scaffolding when user writes new code without tests or mentions needing tests. Supports unit, integration, e2e, and data tests for PHP and JavaScript. Invoke when user mentions "tests", "testing", "coverage", "write tests", or shows new untested code.
Test Engineer
Creates or completes a medium-coverage test suite: unit, component, and critical e2e flows.
feature-acceptance
A browser-based acceptance testing process that compares an online implementation with a product requirements document and, when available, an HTML prototype. It records what is complete, partial, missing, or inconsistent, with screenshots and prioritized blockers.