Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup --skill team-executegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setupWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup/team-execute)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup/team-execute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup/team-execute/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup/team-execute"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup/team-execute.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00057 | $0.02017 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00023 | $0.00807 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00403 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00202 |
Grade A, and why
team-execute scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 21d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 251 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Team Execute
Execute implementation plans using the team-dev multi-agent pipeline. Bridges planning (write-plan, plan mode) with parallel agent execution (team-lead, architect, frontend-dev, backend-dev, test-engineer, qa-engineer, docs-engineer).
Usage
/team-execute <plan-file> # Execute plan with full pipeline
/team-execute <plan-file> --skip-architect # Skip architect (plan has contracts)
/team-execute --feature "description" # No plan file, architect designs from scratch
Parse Arguments
Extract mode and arguments from: {{ARGUMENTS}}
If ARGS contains a .md file path → MODE = plan
If ARGS contains --feature "..." → MODE = feature
If ARGS is empty → show help
Options:
--skip-architect: Skip Phase 1 (plan already has API contracts + file paths)--dry-run: Show what would be spawned without executing--feature "description": Start from scratch with just a feature description
If no arguments provided, show help:
/team-execute - Execute plans with team-dev agents
Usage:
/team-execute .claude/plans/my-plan.md Full pipeline
/team-execute .claude/plans/my-plan.md --skip-arch Skip architect
/team-execute --feature "Add user badges system" From scratch
Pipeline: PLAN → PREPARE → IMPLEMENT → VERIFY → DOCUMENT → CONSOLIDATE
Agents: architect → context-engineer + test-engineer → backend-dev + frontend-dev → qa + tests → docs
MODE: plan
Trigger
When first argument is a .md file path.
Process
STEP 1: Read and Validate Plan
├── Read plan file from path
├── Verify file exists and has content
├── Extract plan title (first H1 or filename)
└── Extract feature description (## Context section or first paragraph)
STEP 2: Analyze Plan Depth
├── Has API contracts (tRPC signatures, Zod schemas)?
│ → Can skip architect if --skip-architect flag
├── Has file paths per task?
│ → Tasks can be routed to correct agents
├── Has tasks grouped by role (Backend/Frontend/Test)?
│ → Direct mapping to agents
└── Store analysis for team-lead prompt
STEP 3: Build Team-Lead Prompt
├── Include: feature title + description
├── Include: full plan content (or summary if >5000 chars)
├── Include: execution mode instructions
│ ├── If --skip-architect: "Plan is pre-approved. Skip Phase 1."
│ │ "Use the plan directly as architect output for Phase 2+."
│ └── If no flag: "Run architect to validate and add API contracts."
│ "Architect should USE this plan as starting point, not start from scratch."
└── Include: any constraints from plan (## Constraints section)
STEP 4: Spawn Team-Lead
├── Use Task tool:
│ {
│ subagent_type: "team-lead",
│ name: "team-lead",
│ description: "Execute plan: {title}",
│ prompt: <built prompt from step 3>,
│ mode: "bypassPermissions"
│ }
└── Team-lead takes over full pipeline from here
STEP 5: Report Launch
├── Print summary of what was launched
├── Show plan title and task count
├── Show execution mode (full pipeline vs skip-architect)
└── Note: "Team-lead is now orchestrating. You'll receive updates as phases complete."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 21d ago First seen · 251 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 2ffcb654787d
team-execute is a skill published in the GitHub repository parisgroup-ai/imersao-ia-setup (1 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 2,017 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
technical-documentation
Audit, write, and improve developer documentation using Google's Developer Documentation Style Guide and Technical Writing courses. Use this skill for any documentation work, even when the user names no style guide: "audit our docs", "review this README", "write a README", "getting started guide", "how-to or…
top-design
Create award-winning, immersive web experiences at the level of Awwwards-featured agencies. Use when the user mentions "Awwwards quality", "make my site stunning", "scroll animations", "parallax storytelling", "cinematic web design", "portfolio site", or "brand experience". Also trigger when elevating a standard…
crossing-the-chasm
Navigate the technology adoption lifecycle from early adopters to mainstream market. Use when the user mentions "crossing the chasm", "beachhead segment", "whole product", "early adopters vs mainstream", "tech go-to-market", "bowling pin strategy", "technology adoption lifecycle", "pragmatist buyers", "growth stalled…
design-everyday-things
Apply foundational design principles: affordances, signifiers, constraints, feedback, and conceptual models. Use when the user mentions "why is this confusing", "affordance", "error prevention", "discoverability", "human-centered design", "mental model", "mapping", "seven stages of action", "users keep making…
design-sprint
Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Use when the user mentions "design sprint", "validate before we build", "rapid prototype", "test with users", or "should we build this". Also trigger when a team is stuck in endless debate over a high-stakes product…
traction-eos
Implement the Entrepreneurial Operating System (EOS) to align vision and execution across a company. Use when the user mentions "EOS", "Entrepreneurial Operating System", "V/TO", "quarterly rocks", "Level 10 meetings", "accountability chart", "IDS process", "my company feels chaotic", "we keep having the same…