Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/pass-agent/loomkin/vault-prepnpx skills add pass-agent/loomkin --skill vault-prepgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pass-agent/loomkinWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pass-agent/loomkin/vault-prep)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pass-agent/loomkin/vault-prep"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pass-agent/loomkin/vault-prep.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00503 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00251 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00101 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
vault-prep scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Create or update a meeting prep file with topics and auto-gathered context.
Identify Contributor
Who is adding topics? Look for @mentions or ask.
Check for Existing Prep
vault_search(query: "prep", entry_type: "meeting") filtered to today's date.
- If exists: APPEND MODE — add this person's topics to the existing prep
- If not: CREATE MODE — gather full context and create new prep
Gather Context (CREATE MODE only)
- Recent meetings:
vault_search(query: "*", entry_type: "meeting")last 3- Extract discussion topics, open action items, decisions
- Open follow-ups:
vault_kanban(action: "list")filtered to items with meeting sources - Recent checkins:
vault_search(query: "*", entry_type: "checkin")since last meeting- Summarize as "async updates" — no need to rehash in the meeting
- At-risk OKRs:
vault_search(query: "*", tags: ["okr"])— check frontmatter for status - Upcoming milestones:
vault_search(query: "milestone", tags: ["in-progress"])
Parse Topics
From user input, extract:
- Topics they want to discuss
- Decisions that need to be made
- Questions they have
Create/Update Entry
CREATE: vault_create_entry(entry_type: "meeting", ...) with prep content, include prep_generated: true and contributors: ["{person}"] in extra_frontmatter
APPEND: vault_update_entry(append: "{person}'s topics:\n- [ ] Topic 1\n- [ ] Topic 2")
Also update contributors list in frontmatter.
Check for duplicate topics across contributors — note "(Also raised by {other person})" if similar.
Report
CREATE: Topics added, context gathered (follow-ups count, async updates, at-risk items) APPEND: Topics added, existing agenda summary, current contributors list
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 56 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 3d73dd8d5f61
vault-prep is a skill published in the GitHub repository pass-agent/loomkin (179 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 503 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
elixir
Use when writing or refactoring Elixir/OTP on the BEAM — GenServers, supervision trees and restart strategies, pattern matching, mix projects and releases — or when processes misbehave (restart loops, mailbox growth, call timeouts). NOT a Phoenix web app, LiveView, Ecto or channels (that is phoenix).
phoenix
Use when building an Elixir web app with Phoenix — contexts, Ecto schemas, changesets and migrations, LiveView, channels and PubSub, the generators, and the boundary between domain logic and the web layer. Covers the classic LiveView over-rendering and Ecto N+1 traps. NOT pure OTP work with no web or Ecto layer …
sync-docs
This skill should be used when the user asks to "sync docs", "update guides", "check docs against official", "refresh documentation", "compare guides to official docs", "update docs from upstream", or mentions syncing the SDK documentation guides with the official Claude Agent SDK documentation.
cli-sync
This skill should be used when the user asks to "check CLI schema", "sync CLI version", "check for new CLI options", "update bundled CLI", "compare SDK structs", "check schema drift", "align message structs", "verify CLI compatibility", "check control protocol", or mentions CLI compatibility, schema alignment, or…
code-review
Reviews code changes for quality, security, and best practices.
unit-converter
Converts between common units of measurement including temperature, distance, and weight.