coverage-strategist

coverage-strategist is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from patricio0312rev/skillset. It costs 47 tokens per session (2,412 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of coverage-strategist, MIT.

A test coverage strategy decides which parts of a codebase deserve tests and how much confidence each area needs. It prioritizes critical user and business paths instead of treating every line as equally important.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to identify critical paths, set targets by testing layer, prioritize authentication and checkout, and document testing exclusions.
Why use it?
It prevents teams from spending time chasing a 100% coverage number while important behavior remains untested. Clear priorities also show what should deliberately not be tested.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it to identify critical paths, set targets by testing layer, prioritize authentication and checkout, and document testing exclusions.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/coverage-strategist
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add patricio0312rev/skillset --skill coverage-strategist
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/patricio0312rev/skillset

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for coverage-strategist

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/coverage-strategist/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/coverage-strategist)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/coverage-strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/coverage-strategist/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for coverage-strategist

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/coverage-strategist"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/coverage-strategist.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 47 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,412 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00047 $0.02412
Opus 5 $0.00023 $0.01206
Sonnet 5 $0.00009 $0.00482
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00241

Measured 9d ago against content hash 946a4927bca8, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coverage-strategist scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to coverage-strategist — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

templates/testing/coverage-strategist/SKILL.md · 437 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 437 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Coverage Strategist

Define pragmatic, ROI-focused test coverage strategies.

Coverage Philosophy

Goal: Maximum confidence with minimum tests

Principle: 100% coverage is not the goal. Test what matters.

Critical Path Identification

// Critical paths that MUST be tested
const criticalPaths = {
  authentication: {
    priority: "P0",
    coverage: "100%",
    paths: [
      "User login flow",
      "User registration",
      "Password reset",
      "Token refresh",
      "Session management",
    ],
    reasoning: "Security critical, impacts all users",
  },

  checkout: {
    priority: "P0",
    coverage: "100%",
    paths: [
      "Add to cart",
      "Update cart",
      "Apply coupon",
      "Process payment",
      "Order confirmation",
    ],
    reasoning: "Revenue critical, business essential",
  },

  dataIntegrity: {
    priority: "P0",
    coverage: "100%",
    paths: [
      "User data CRUD",
      "Order creation",
      "Inventory updates",
      "Database transactions",
    ],
    reasoning: "Data corruption would be catastrophic",
  },
};

// Important but not critical
const importantPaths = {
  userProfile: {
    priority: "P1",
    coverage: "80%",
    paths: ["Profile updates", "Avatar upload", "Preferences"],
    reasoning: "Important UX, but not business critical",
  },

  search: {
    priority: "P1",
    coverage: "70%",
    paths: ["Product search", "Filters", "Sorting"],
    reasoning: "Enhances experience, not essential",
  },
};

Layer-Specific Targets

# Coverage Targets by Layer

## Business Logic / Core Functions: 90-100%

**Why**: High ROI - complex logic, many edge cases
**What to test**:

- Calculations
- Validations
- State machines
- Algorithms
- Data transformations

## API Endpoints: 80-90%

**Why**: Critical integration points
**What to test**:

- Happy paths
- Error cases
- Validation
- Authentication
- Authorization

## Database Layer: 70-80%

**Why**: Data integrity matters
**What to test**:

- CRUD operations
- Transactions
- Constraints
- Migrations

## UI Components: 50-70%

**Why**: Lower ROI - visual changes, less critical
**What to test**:

- User interactions
- State changes
- Error states
- Critical flows only

## Utils/Helpers: 80-90%

**Why**: Reused everywhere, high impact
**What to test**:

- All public functions
- Edge cases
- Error handling

Read the full file on GitHub · 437 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 437 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 946a4927bca8

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coverage-strategist is a skill published in the GitHub repository patricio0312rev/skillset (6 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 2,412 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to coverage-strategist, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

research-engineer

An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 43 tokens

tika-eval-compare

Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".

apache/tika · 50 tokens

neuron-evaluation-engineer

Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…

neuron-core/neuron-ai · 77 tokens

jetson-validate-image

Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.

NVIDIA/skills · 50 tokens

atmos-validation

Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.

cloudposse/atmos · 31 tokens

skill-benchmark

Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 16 tokens