Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add patricio0312rev/skillset --skill evaluation-harnessgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/patricio0312rev/skillsetWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.01422 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00711 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00284 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00142 |
Grade A, and why
evaluation-harness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to evaluation-harness — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 220 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Evaluation Harness
Build systematic evaluation frameworks for LLM applications.
Golden Dataset Format
[
{
"id": "test_001",
"category": "code_generation",
"input": "Write a Python function to reverse a string",
"expected_output": "def reverse_string(s: str) -> str:\n return s[::-1]",
"rubric": {
"correctness": 1.0,
"style": 0.8,
"documentation": 0.5
},
"metadata": {
"difficulty": "easy",
"tags": ["python", "strings"]
}
}
]
Scoring Rubrics
from typing import Dict, Any
def score_exact_match(actual: str, expected: str) -> float:
"""Binary score: 1.0 if exact match, 0.0 otherwise"""
return 1.0 if actual.strip() == expected.strip() else 0.0
def score_semantic_similarity(actual: str, expected: str) -> float:
"""Cosine similarity of embeddings"""
actual_emb = get_embedding(actual)
expected_emb = get_embedding(expected)
return cosine_similarity(actual_emb, expected_emb)
def score_contains_keywords(actual: str, keywords: List[str]) -> float:
"""Percentage of required keywords present"""
found = sum(1 for kw in keywords if kw.lower() in actual.lower())
return found / len(keywords)
def score_with_llm(actual: str, expected: str, rubric: Dict[str, float]) -> Dict[str, float]:
"""Use LLM as judge"""
prompt = f"""
Grade this output on a scale of 0-1 for each criterion:
Expected: {expected}
Actual: {actual}
Criteria: {', '.join(rubric.keys())}
Return JSON with scores.
"""
return json.loads(llm(prompt))
Test Runner
class EvaluationHarness:
def __init__(self, dataset_path: str):
self.dataset = self.load_dataset(dataset_path)
self.results = []
def run_evaluation(self, model_fn):
for test_case in self.dataset:
# Generate output
actual = model_fn(test_case["input"])
# Score
scores = self.score_output(
actual,
test_case["expected_output"],
test_case["rubric"]
)
# Record result
self.results.append({
"test_id": test_case["id"],
"category": test_case["category"],
"scores": scores,
"passed": self.check_threshold(scores, test_case),
"actual_output": actual,
})
return self.generate_report()
def score_output(self, actual, expected, rubric):
return {
"exact_match": score_exact_match(actual, expected),
"semantic_similarity": score_semantic_similarity(actual, expected),
**score_with_llm(actual, expected, rubric)
}
def check_threshold(self, scores, test_case):
min_scores = test_case.get("min_scores", {})
for metric, threshold in min_scores.items():
if scores.get(metric, 0) < threshold:
return False
return True
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 220 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 6ebe8da223f5
evaluation-harness is a skill published in the GitHub repository patricio0312rev/skillset (6 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,422 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to evaluation-harness, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-engineer
An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.
tika-eval-compare
Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".
neuron-evaluation-engineer
Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…
jetson-validate-image
Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.
atmos-validation
Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.
skill-benchmark
Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.