evaluation-harness

evaluation-harness is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from patricio0312rev/skillset. It costs 48 tokens per session (1,422 once invoked), scanned A, a copy of evaluation-harness, MIT.

A system for repeatedly testing and measuring AI applications with fixed test examples, scoring rules, thresholds, and regression reports.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to build evaluation tests for tasks such as code generation, assign scores with rubrics, and report pass or fail results.
Why use it?
It makes changes in an AI system easier to compare over time and exposes when quality gets worse.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to build evaluation tests for tasks such as code generation, assign scores with rubrics, and report pass or fail results.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add patricio0312rev/skillset --skill evaluation-harness
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/patricio0312rev/skillset

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for evaluation-harness

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for evaluation-harness

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/patricio0312rev/skillset/evaluation-harness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 48 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,422 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00048 $0.01422
Opus 5 $0.00024 $0.00711
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00284
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00142

Measured 11d ago against content hash 6ebe8da223f5, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

evaluation-harness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to evaluation-harness — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

templates/ai-engineering/evaluation-harness/SKILL.md · 220 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 220 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Evaluation Harness

Build systematic evaluation frameworks for LLM applications.

Golden Dataset Format

[
  {
    "id": "test_001",
    "category": "code_generation",
    "input": "Write a Python function to reverse a string",
    "expected_output": "def reverse_string(s: str) -> str:\n    return s[::-1]",
    "rubric": {
      "correctness": 1.0,
      "style": 0.8,
      "documentation": 0.5
    },
    "metadata": {
      "difficulty": "easy",
      "tags": ["python", "strings"]
    }
  }
]

Scoring Rubrics

from typing import Dict, Any

def score_exact_match(actual: str, expected: str) -> float:
    """Binary score: 1.0 if exact match, 0.0 otherwise"""
    return 1.0 if actual.strip() == expected.strip() else 0.0

def score_semantic_similarity(actual: str, expected: str) -> float:
    """Cosine similarity of embeddings"""
    actual_emb = get_embedding(actual)
    expected_emb = get_embedding(expected)
    return cosine_similarity(actual_emb, expected_emb)

def score_contains_keywords(actual: str, keywords: List[str]) -> float:
    """Percentage of required keywords present"""
    found = sum(1 for kw in keywords if kw.lower() in actual.lower())
    return found / len(keywords)

def score_with_llm(actual: str, expected: str, rubric: Dict[str, float]) -> Dict[str, float]:
    """Use LLM as judge"""
    prompt = f"""
    Grade this output on a scale of 0-1 for each criterion:

    Expected: {expected}
    Actual: {actual}

    Criteria: {', '.join(rubric.keys())}

    Return JSON with scores.
    """
    return json.loads(llm(prompt))

Test Runner

class EvaluationHarness:
    def __init__(self, dataset_path: str):
        self.dataset = self.load_dataset(dataset_path)
        self.results = []

    def run_evaluation(self, model_fn):
        for test_case in self.dataset:
            # Generate output
            actual = model_fn(test_case["input"])

            # Score
            scores = self.score_output(
                actual,
                test_case["expected_output"],
                test_case["rubric"]
            )

            # Record result
            self.results.append({
                "test_id": test_case["id"],
                "category": test_case["category"],
                "scores": scores,
                "passed": self.check_threshold(scores, test_case),
                "actual_output": actual,
            })

        return self.generate_report()

    def score_output(self, actual, expected, rubric):
        return {
            "exact_match": score_exact_match(actual, expected),
            "semantic_similarity": score_semantic_similarity(actual, expected),
            **score_with_llm(actual, expected, rubric)
        }

    def check_threshold(self, scores, test_case):
        min_scores = test_case.get("min_scores", {})
        for metric, threshold in min_scores.items():
            if scores.get(metric, 0) < threshold:
                return False
        return True

Read the full file on GitHub · 220 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 11d ago First seen · 220 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 6ebe8da223f5

Subscribe to this mod's changes

evaluation-harness is a skill published in the GitHub repository patricio0312rev/skillset (6 stars, last pushed 8mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 1,422 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to evaluation-harness, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

research-engineer

An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.

davila7/claude-code-templates · 43 tokens

tika-eval-compare

Compare extracts from two Tika builds over a corpus to detect regressions in content, encoding, exceptions, and embedded-document handling. Use for "compare before/after extracts", "eval this change against the corpus".

apache/tika · 50 tokens

neuron-evaluation-engineer

Create and run AI evaluations with datasets, assertions, and output drivers in Neuron AI. Use this skill whenever the user mentions evaluation, testing AI systems, creating evaluators, dataset-driven testing, assertion-based validation, or wants to measure AI system performance. Also trigger for tasks involving…

neuron-core/neuron-ai · 77 tokens

jetson-validate-image

Use after jetson-flash-image to run static BSP checks, on-target smoke/regression tests on a flashed DUT, or both. Not for build or flash steps. Triggers: validate bsp, on-target validation.

NVIDIA/skills · 50 tokens

atmos-validation

Validate Atmos projects, components, arbitrary JSON Schema inputs, EditorConfig, and GitHub Actions; use affected-file selection and native CI annotations.

cloudposse/atmos · 31 tokens

skill-benchmark

Benchmark AI skill effectiveness by measuring implementation quality against legacy constraints.

HoangNguyen0403/agent-skills-standard · 16 tokens