Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add paularlott/llmrouter --skill code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paularlott/llmrouterWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/paularlott/llmrouter/code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paularlott/llmrouter/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paularlott/llmrouter/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paularlott/llmrouter/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paularlott/llmrouter/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00046 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00018 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00009 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00005 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
- Read the full diff twice.
- Check tests cover the changed behaviour.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 11 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A d2025957b958
code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository paularlott/llmrouter (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 46 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-26.
Other skills, from other repositories
research-papers
Use when the user wants a literature review, paper summary, research landscape, or sourced synthesis from papers, reports, abstracts, or converted PDFs.
seo-audit
Use when auditing SEO with axon map, scrape, search, rendered checks, metadata review, sitemap/site analysis, SERP comparison, or scraped-page findings.
qa
QA test a live website with Axon discovery/content evidence plus browser automation when interaction is required. Use when the user wants exploratory QA, form testing, navigation/link checks, responsive checks, performance observations, bug reports, or a pre-launch quality review.
shop
Use when the user wants Axon-backed product research, product comparisons, review synthesis, budget-aware recommendations, or cart preparation without checkout.
continual-learning
Nightly refinement of an existing per-repo review-style prompt using this reviewer's own finding outcomes. Read confirmed (resolved-by-commit / thumbs-up) and dismissed (thumbs-down) findings, promote the bug patterns the team actually fixes, demote the false-positive patterns, reconcile against the current prompt…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.