Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to paulasilvatech/specky. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paulasilvatech/specky/main/.apm/skills/specky-implementer/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paulasilvatech/speckyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/paulasilvatech/specky/specky-implementer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paulasilvatech/specky/specky-implementer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paulasilvatech/specky/specky-implementer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00525 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
specky-implementer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 60 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 475cc070ffea
specky-implementer is a skill published in the GitHub repository paulasilvatech/specky (18 stars, last pushed yesterday), with no licence file. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 525 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-tdd
Build a behavior change with observed red, minimal green, and measured test consolidation.
outside-in-tdd
Use when writing tests from the outside-in, defining behavior before code, or any feature where tests should start from observable business behavior and let internal design emerge.
testing-strategy
Design test strategies and test plans with coverage targets. Complements /draft:coverage which measures what this skill plans. Auto-loaded by /draft:implement before TDD.
test-driven-development
Drives implementation test-first through red-green-refactor cycles: one failing test, the minimal code to pass it, then cleanup under green. Use before writing production code for a new behavior, and whenever the request mentions TDD, test-driven, test-first, red-green-refactor, "write the test first", "start with a…
test-driven-development-quick
Runs the red-green-refactor loop with a compact set of rules: one failing test, the minimal code to pass it, cleanup under green. Use for routine test-first work on a single behavior or a small bug fix, and when the request mentions TDD, test-first, red-green-refactor, or writing the test before the code. For…
ralphctl-test-driven-development
Execute-phase skill — write the failing test before the code that makes it pass; for bug fixes, this is the reproduction test itself. Use for any logic change, bug fix, or behavioural modification; for the full root-cause triage pipeline around an unexpected failure, see ralphctl-debugging-and-error-recovery.