Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to paullukic/coograph. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paullukic/coograph/main/.github/skills/coograph-propose/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paullukic/coographWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/paullukic/coograph/coograph-propose)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paullukic/coograph/coograph-propose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paullukic/coograph/coograph-propose/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paullukic/coograph/coograph-propose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paullukic/coograph/coograph-propose.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.00934 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00467 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00187 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00093 |
Grade A, and why
coograph-propose scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 133 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Propose a new change — investigate the codebase, create all artifacts, and wait for approval before implementing.
Step 1: Understand what to build
If no input was provided, ask the user:
"What change do you want to work on? Describe what you want to build or fix."
From their description, derive a kebab-case slug (e.g., "add user auth"). Wait for their answer before proceeding.
Step 2: Investigate the codebase
Before writing anything:
- Read
.github/copilot-instructions.mdfor conventions and stack. - Search for related files, existing patterns, integration points, and risks relevant to this change.
- Identify which files will likely be modified or created.
Step 3: Create the change directory
Create openspec/changes/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<slug>/ using today's date.
Create .openspec.yaml with:
schema: spec-driven
name: <slug>
created: <YYYY-MM-DD>
Step 4: Create proposal.md
Write openspec/changes/<slug>/proposal.md:
# Proposal: <human-readable title>
## Why
[Problem being solved and motivation]
## Goals
- [Concrete, measurable deliverable]
## Non-Goals
- [Explicit out-of-scope items]
## Decisions
- [Key design decisions and why they were made]
## Impact
- Files to modify: [specific file paths]
- Files to create: [specific file paths]
- Dependencies affected: [if any]
## Risks
- [Risk]: [mitigation]
Step 5: Create specs//spec.md
Write openspec/changes/<slug>/specs/<capability>/spec.md:
# Spec: <capability name>
## Requirements
- [Requirement 1]
- [Requirement 2]
## Scenarios
### Scenario: <description>
- Given: [precondition]
- When: [action]
- Then: [expected outcome]
Step 6: Create tasks.md
Write openspec/changes/<slug>/tasks.md with 3-8 tasks grouped by logical unit (not per-file):
# Tasks: <change-name>
- [ ] **<Logical group title>** — [description of what this group accomplishes]
- Files: [file paths]
- Acceptance: [measurable criteria]
- [ ] **Verification** — Run quality gates and confirm all acceptance criteria are met
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 133 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A fff456221408
coograph-propose is a skill published in the GitHub repository paullukic/coograph (17 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 934 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
todos
This chat has a shared, live TODO plan — your tasks for the conversation, which the user also edits. Read this skill and reach for the todo tools whenever a request takes more than a couple of steps. It covers the plan model (group = task, items = its steps; loose items are the user's lane), how to work it: propose…
writing-specs
Use when a workflow step drafts or revises a spec artifact — a goal-and-requirements, an architecture, or a module SPEC — or when a workflow skill names it at such a step. The shared quality bar for specs — not a workflow, nothing to execute.
ai-ml-development
AI and machine learning development with PyTorch, TensorFlow, and LLM integration. Use when building ML models, training pipelines, fine-tuning LLMs, or implementing AI features.
case-interview-practice
Interactive consulting case interview practice with structured frameworks, feedback mechanisms, and progressive difficulty. Use when preparing for management consulting interviews, case competitions, or business problem-solving exercises.
finance
Financial analysis expertise for financial modeling (DCF, LBO, M&A), valuation, financial statement analysis, capital allocation, treasury management, and corporate finance decisions. Use when building financial models, analyzing statements, or making investment decisions.
i18n-localization
Internationalization and localization for global applications. Use when adding multi-language support, handling regional formats, or preparing apps for global markets.