Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add paultyng/skill-issue --skill ship-itgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paultyng/skill-issueWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/paultyng/skill-issue/ship-it)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paultyng/skill-issue/ship-it"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paultyng/skill-issue/ship-it/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/paultyng/skill-issue/ship-it"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/paultyng/skill-issue/ship-it.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00063 | $0.01000 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00025 | $0.00400 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00200 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00100 |
Grade A, and why
ship-it scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 84 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Ship It
Run the full pre-commit pipeline, commit, push, and handle PR housekeeping.
1. Verify
Run verification per verify-when-complete. Stop if any step fails.
Review-status check (informational, non-blocking). If a .reviews/<date>/SUMMARY.md exists whose GIT_COMMIT_FULL metadata header matches the current HEAD SHA, count the rows under ## Findings — untracked and inside the <details> block for Findings — tracked, then print a single line:
Review status: <N> untracked / <M> tracked findings @ <short-sha> (<.reviews/path>)
Do not block on N > 0 — /ship-it runs because the user said so. The line is a sanity check, not a gate. If no matching SUMMARY.md exists, skip the line silently (don't run /review-all from here).
2. Changelog
Check if the project has a changelog convention:
- If
Taskfile.yamlhas achangelogtask, runtask changelogand follow its output. - Otherwise, look for existing changelog entries:
- Per-PR fragment directories like
.changeset/(JS/TS via@changesets/cli),.changes/(Python viatowncrier), or similar project-defined conventions CHANGELOG.mdat the repo root
- Per-PR fragment directories like
- If a convention is found, create a terse entry following the existing format and patterns.
- If no changelog convention exists, skip this step.
3. Commit
Stage all changes and commit using Conventional Commits format:
<type>[optional scope]: <description>
Common types: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore, ci, build.
Always create a new commit. Never amend.
Apply terse-output commit-message tone: imperative subject ≤72 chars, body explains why (the diff shows what), no "this commit does X" / "I" / "we" / "now". Keep the Co-Authored-By: Claude… attribution.
4. Push and PR
Push the current branch:
git push -u origin HEAD
If a PR exists for the current branch, update its title and description to reflect the current state:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 84 lines · 63 tokens per session scan A b6917481ac31
ship-it is a skill published in the GitHub repository paultyng/skill-issue (8 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 63 tokens to every session and 1,000 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
git-onboarding-auto
A Git setup and pull-request workflow automation skill. Git is the version-control tool developers use to track code changes, while a pull request is a request for teammates to review and merge those changes.
omh-deploy-and-monitor
This is an OMH deploy-and-monitor workflow skill, projected for Agent Skills hosts (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, opencode, OpenClaw, pi).
release-rollback
Roll a release back for real when post-deploy regression goes red — apc release rollback flips the current version to pulled and the last good version back to current in the release ledger, and (with --mirror) repoints the bare mirror ref. Behind an approval gate; with no previous good version it BLOCKS instead of…
github-release-briefing-skill
Create a source-linked briefing for the latest published GitHub release of a public repository. Use for engineering teams tracking a dependency release; do not use it to publish releases or change repositories.
release-and-publish
Ship a release end-to-end across every registry the project targets (npm, MCP Registry, GitHub Releases for .mcpb bundles, GHCR). Runs the final verification gate, fast-forwards main when the release rode a release PR, creates the annotated tag on the commit main now points at, pushes commits and tags, then publishes…
release-pr-review
Review pass on an open release PR (release/ → main) — the step between git-wrapup and release-and-publish when a project releases in gated release PR mode. Reads the PR's commit range through the code-simplifier lens plus a correctness review, verifies whatever an automated reviewer left on the PR, lands fixes as…