Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Pawel-Kica/claude-code-100 --skill super-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pawel-Kica/claude-code-100Wrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pawel-kica/claude-code-100/super-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pawel-kica/claude-code-100/super-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pawel-kica/claude-code-100/super-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pawel-kica/claude-code-100/super-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pawel-kica/claude-code-100/super-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.03135 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.01254 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00627 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00314 |
Grade A, and why
super-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 17d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 17d ago Changed · +234 lines · +5 tokens per session 9e44ef1ede08
- 1mo ago Changed f1958d7ce674
- 1mo ago Changed · -20 lines ed516e3d4415
- 1mo ago First seen · 42 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A dc13d9c24873
super-code-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository Pawel-Kica/claude-code-100 (2 stars, last pushed 18d ago), with no licence file. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 3,135 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
discount-review
Inspect the discount policy fixture with a repeatable review checklist and helper script.
code-review
Reviews code for bugs, security issues, and best practices.
code-review-csharp
Perform structured code reviews of C# source code covering naming conventions, performance, security, readability, and .NET best practices. Trigger phrases include "review this C# code", "check my C# for best practices", "analyze this C# class", "find issues in my C# code".
mcp-server-review
Review a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server implementation against the 2026-07-28 protocol revision, which removed the initialize handshake and Mcp-Session-Id and made the protocol stateless. Use when the user asks to review, audit, upgrade or migrate an MCP server, asks whether their MCP server is spec compliant…
ai-engineering-toolkit
Overview of six AI engineering workflows: prompt evaluation (8-dimension scoring), context budget planning, RAG pipeline design, agent security audit (65-point checklist), eval harness building, and product sense coaching.
promptfoo-provider-setup
Connect Promptfoo to a model, live HTTP API, local Python/JavaScript provider, or app code. Use for request/auth mapping, response parsing, OpenAPI setup, and connection smoke tests. Use promptfoo-evals for broader eval coverage and promptfoo-redteam-setup for attack selection.