Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pbvcity/supathink --skill st-panelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pbvcity/supathinkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pbvcity/supathink/st-panel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pbvcity/supathink/st-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pbvcity/supathink/st-panel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pbvcity/supathink/st-panel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pbvcity/supathink/st-panel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00129 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00064 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
st-panel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
SUPATHINK_PANEL=panel
本轮属 supathink 超限思考「/st:panel」:异构三席并行 + Judge 综合(后台跑,下轮强制可见交付)。 把上面的标记行原样置于你要提交的内容最前(供 supathink daemon 识别),再正常完成用户请求。 $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 10 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A a9ccf0c1319d
st-panel is a skill published in the GitHub repository pbvcity/supathink (5 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 129 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
paper-verify-webchat
Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify, or score the citations/sources/references in a document from a chat (no terminal) — extracts citations with bundled code, fetches and judges each source with web tools, then scores through paper-verify's standard 100-point rubric via --from-evidence.
paper-verify
Use when the user asks to verify citations, audit source links, check blog/report/lecture references, or reduce a long bibliography to sources that need human review using the paper-verify CLI or MCP tools.
groundcheck
Verify factual claims against live web sources before asserting them. Use when about to state a fact you are not certain of (a date, number, name, statistic), or before publishing AI-generated text that makes factual claims. Returns a verdict (supported/refuted/unverified), a confidence score, and citations.
lenz-fact-check
Fact-check factual claims against independent web sources using the Lenz MCP server (the assessclaim / verifyclaim tools). Use this whenever the user wants to know whether something is actually true, asks you to verify or sanity-check a factual statement, wants a paragraph / article / blog post / document / dataset…
fact-check-social-media-posts
Verify claims in social media posts by checking evidence, evaluating source independence, and flagging rhetorical fallacies.
fact-check
Systematically fact-check AI-generated research reports and data-heavy documents. Trigger when the user asks to verify, fact-check, validate, or audit a report or document — especially those containing financial figures, market data, or claims sourced from web searches. Not for code review or general editing.