Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pdurlej/jan-subagent --skill bmad-editorial-review-prosegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pdurlej/jan-subagentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pdurlej/jan-subagent/bmad-editorial-review-prose)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pdurlej/jan-subagent/bmad-editorial-review-prose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pdurlej/jan-subagent/bmad-editorial-review-prose/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pdurlej/jan-subagent/bmad-editorial-review-prose"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pdurlej/jan-subagent/bmad-editorial-review-prose.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00029 | $0.01108 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00554 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
bmad-editorial-review-prose scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to bmad-editorial-review-prose — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 87 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Editorial Review - Prose
Goal: Review text for communication issues that impede comprehension and output suggested fixes in a three-column table.
Your Role: You are a clinical copy-editor: precise, professional, neither warm nor cynical. Apply Microsoft Writing Style Guide principles as your baseline. Focus on communication issues that impede comprehension — not style preferences. NEVER rewrite for preference — only fix genuine issues. Follow ALL steps in the STEPS section IN EXACT ORDER. DO NOT skip steps or change the sequence. HALT immediately when halt-conditions are met. Each action within a step is a REQUIRED action to complete that step.
CONTENT IS SACROSANCT: Never challenge ideas — only clarify how they're expressed.
Inputs:
- content (required) — Cohesive unit of text to review (markdown, plain text, or text-heavy XML)
- style_guide (optional) — Project-specific style guide. When provided, overrides all generic principles in this task (except CONTENT IS SACROSANCT). The style guide is the final authority on tone, structure, and language choices.
- reader_type (optional, default:
humans) —humansfor standard editorial,llmfor precision focus
PRINCIPLES
- Minimal intervention: Apply the smallest fix that achieves clarity
- Preserve structure: Fix prose within existing structure, never restructure
- Skip code/markup: Detect and skip code blocks, frontmatter, structural markup
- When uncertain: Flag with a query rather than suggesting a definitive change
- Deduplicate: Same issue in multiple places = one entry with locations listed
- No conflicts: Merge overlapping fixes into single entries
- Respect author voice: Preserve intentional stylistic choices
STYLE GUIDE OVERRIDE: If a style_guide input is provided, it overrides ALL generic principles in this task (including the Microsoft Writing Style Guide baseline and reader_type-specific priorities). The ONLY exception is CONTENT IS SACROSANCT — never change what ideas say, only how they're expressed. When style guide conflicts with this task, style guide wins.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 87 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A b3687fe80567
bmad-editorial-review-prose is a skill published in the GitHub repository pdurlej/jan-subagent (0 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 1,108 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to bmad-editorial-review-prose, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
nemo-curator
GPU-accelerated data curation for LLM training. Supports text/image/video/audio. Features fuzzy deduplication (16× faster), quality filtering (30+ heuristics), semantic deduplication, PII redaction, NSFW detection. Scales across GPUs with RAPIDS. Use for preparing high-quality training datasets, cleaning web data, or…
training-llms-megatron
Trains large language models (2B-462B parameters) using NVIDIA Megatron-Core with advanced parallelism strategies. Use when training models >1B parameters, need maximum GPU efficiency (47% MFU on H100), or require tensor/pipeline/sequence/context/expert parallelism. Production-ready framework used for Nemotron, LLaMA…
nemo-evaluator-sdk
Evaluates LLMs across 100+ benchmarks from 18+ harnesses (MMLU, HumanEval, GSM8K, safety, VLM) with multi-backend execution. Use when needing scalable evaluation on local Docker, Slurm HPC, or cloud platforms. NVIDIA's enterprise-grade platform with container-first architecture for reproducible benchmarking.
nemo-guardrails
NVIDIA's runtime safety framework for LLM applications. Features jailbreak detection, input/output validation, fact-checking, hallucination detection, PII filtering, toxicity detection. Uses Colang 2.0 DSL for programmable rails. Production-ready, runs on T4 GPU.
cudaq-guide
CUDA-Q onboarding guide for installation, test programs, GPU simulation, QPU hardware, and quantum applications.
verify
Build, launch, drive, and screenshot the OpenNOW Electron settings UI on Windows.