Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add PeakCode-AI/PeakCode --skill browser-usegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PeakCode-AI/PeakCodeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/peakcode-ai/peakcode/browser-use)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/peakcode-ai/peakcode/browser-use"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/peakcode-ai/peakcode/browser-use/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/peakcode-ai/peakcode/browser-use"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/peakcode-ai/peakcode/browser-use.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.01055 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00422 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00211 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
browser-use scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 99 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Browser Use
The browser tool drives a real browser pane belonging to this conversation. The pane is
visible: when you open a tab it appears, and it follows what you do. That is the point —
the user can watch the work instead of trusting your summary of it.
The loop
Observe, act once, observe again. Never act twice without looking in between.
navigateto the page (a URL the user gave you, or one you verified from the page — not a guessed variant), orget_tabsif a tab is already open.snapshotto read it. Snapshot is how you see a page: it returns role, name, state and a short ref for every element worth acting on.- Act with a ref from that snapshot.
- Observe the result before concluding anything.
An action returns a receipt — what was dispatched, not what happened. click saying
Dispatched click (ref e5) means the event was sent. Whether the page changed is a
separate question you answer with another observation.
Reading a page
snapshot is the default and the primary. It is cheaper than a screenshot, works without
a vision model, and gives you the refs the actions need. Reuse the snapshot you already
have until the page changes underneath it.
Take a screenshot only when sight is genuinely required:
- the question is visual — layout, styling, whether something rendered at all;
- the user asked for a screenshot;
- the target is not in the tree (canvas, custom-drawn widget) and you need to aim at it.
Do not take a snapshot and a screenshot of the same state as a matter of habit.
Refs
A ref (e12) names an element in one snapshot. It is not a stable identifier:
- A ref from an earlier snapshot is refused. That is deliberate — the node behind it may now be a different element. Take a fresh snapshot and use a ref from it.
- Navigating, reloading, or moving through history invalidates every ref, because they described the previous document.
- After an action that changes the page, snapshot again before you act on anything you saw before it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 99 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 2e1e3fda8163
browser-use is a skill published in the GitHub repository PeakCode-AI/PeakCode (142 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 1,055 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-18.
browser-use compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| browser-usePeakCode-AI/PeakCode | Skill | 142 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 37 | Claude Code, Codex |
| interactive-loginyc-software/qm | Skill | 16k | yesterday | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code, Codex |
| pinchtab-mcppinchtab/pinchtab | Skill | 11k | 10d ago | MIT | A | 52 | Claude Code, Codex |
| azure-messaging-webpubsub-javamicrosoft/skills | Skill | 3.2k | yesterday | MIT | A | 43 | Claude Code |
| cua-driverdavidondrej/skills | Skill | 4.3k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 68 | Claude Code, Codex |
| open-design-browsercompozy/compozy | Skill | 2.8k | yesterday | MIT | A | 56 | Claude Code, Codex |
| southwestborski/travel-hacking-toolkit | Skill | 895 | yesterday | MIT | A | 40 | Claude Code |