Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pedrohcgs/Claude-Mini --skill pedagogy-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrohcgs/Claude-MiniWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-mini/pedagogy-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-mini/pedagogy-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-mini/pedagogy-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-mini/pedagogy-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedrohcgs/claude-mini/pedagogy-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00391 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00196 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00078 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00039 |
Grade A, and why
pedagogy-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Pedagogical Review of Lecture Slides
Perform a comprehensive pedagogical review using the PhD econometrics student lens.
Steps
-
Identify the file specified in
$ARGUMENTS- If no argument, ask user which lecture to review
- If just a name (e.g.,
Lecture4_StaggeredRollout.qmd), look inQuarto/ - If
.texfile, look inSlides/
-
Launch the pedagogy-reviewer agent with the full file path
- The agent reads the entire file
- Checks 12 pedagogical patterns distilled from completed lectures
- Performs deck-level analysis (narrative arc, pacing, visual rhythm, notation consistency)
- Considers PhD student perspective (prerequisites, potential objections)
-
The agent produces a report saved to:
quality_reports/[FILENAME_WITHOUT_EXT]_pedagogy_report.md -
Present summary to user:
- Patterns followed vs violated (out of 12)
- Deck-level assessments (narrative arc, pacing, notation)
- Critical recommendations (top 3-5)
Important Notes
- This is a read-only review — no files are edited
- The agent uses a PhD student lens — assumes advanced econometrics background but checks that cutting-edge panel methods are introduced properly
- Focuses on pedagogy not visual layout (use
/visual-auditfor that) - For a combined review of everything, use
/slide-excellenceinstead
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 39 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A c97ccc8ee976
pedagogy-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedrohcgs/Claude-Mini (11 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 391 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
hr-onboarding
A new-hire onboarding plan as a single page — first week schedule, buddy + manager intro, learning track, equipment checklist, and "you're set when…" outcomes. Use when the brief mentions "onboarding", "new hire", "first week plan", or "入职".
book-mirror
Take any book (EPUB/PDF), produce a personalized chapter-by-chapter analysis. Each chapter is preserved in detail (The Chapter) and mirrored back to the reader's actual life (The Mirror) using brain context. The mirror observes and resonates — a friend pointing out parallels, NOT a consultant rearranging the reader's…
miniapp
Build a tiny interactive HTML playground only when someone asks to see, play with, or step through a mechanism.
eli5
Explain research, papers, or technical ideas in plain English with minimal jargon, concrete analogies, and clear takeaways. Use when the user says "ELI5 this", asks for a simple explanation of a paper or research result, wants jargon removed, or asks what something technically dense actually means.
deck-course-module
A course or workshop slide template with persistent learning goals, teaching pages, multiple-choice self-tests, and a wrap-up.
master-yinguang
A reference-based assistant for questions about Yinguang and Pure Land Buddhism, a Buddhist tradition focused on faith, ethical living, and practice connected with rebirth in the Pure Land. It can answer in Yinguang’s historical teaching style.