Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedroiff0/awesome-skillsnpx agentmods add skills/pedroiff0/awesome-skills/github-repo-managementWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedroiff0/awesome-skills/github-repo-management)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedroiff0/awesome-skills/github-repo-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedroiff0/awesome-skills/github-repo-management/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedroiff0/awesome-skills/github-repo-management"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedroiff0/awesome-skills/github-repo-management.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.04070 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00009 | $0.02035 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00814 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00407 |
Grade A, and why
github-repo-management scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
83% identical to github-repo-management — 20 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 517 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub Repository Management
Create, clone, fork, configure, and manage GitHub repositories. Each section shows gh first, then the git + curl fallback.
Prerequisites
- Authenticated with GitHub (see
github-authskill)
Setup
if command -v gh &>/dev/null && gh auth status &>/dev/null; then
AUTH="gh"
else
AUTH="git"
if [ -z "$GITHUB_TOKEN" ]; then
if _hermes_env="${HERMES_HOME:-$HOME/.hermes}/.env"; [ -f "$_hermes_env" ] && grep -q "^GITHUB_TOKEN=" "$_hermes_env"; then
GITHUB_TOKEN=$(grep "^GITHUB_TOKEN=" "$_hermes_env" | head -1 | cut -d= -f2 | tr -d '\n\r')
elif grep -q "github.com" ~/.git-credentials 2>/dev/null; then
GITHUB_TOKEN=$(grep "github.com" ~/.git-credentials 2>/dev/null | head -1 | sed 's|https://[^:]*:\([^@]*\)@.*|\1|')
fi
fi
fi
# Get your GitHub username (needed for several operations)
if [ "$AUTH" = "gh" ]; then
GH_USER=$(gh api user --jq '.login')
else
GH_USER=$(curl -s -H "Authorization: token $GITHUB_TOKEN" https://api.github.com/user | python3 -c "import sys,json; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['login'])")
fi
If you're inside a repo already:
REMOTE_URL=$(git remote get-url origin)
OWNER_REPO=$(echo "$REMOTE_URL" | sed -E 's|.*github\.com[:/]||; s|\.git$||')
OWNER=$(echo "$OWNER_REPO" | cut -d/ -f1)
REPO=$(echo "$OWNER_REPO" | cut -d/ -f2)
1. Cloning Repositories
Cloning is pure git — works identically either way:
# Clone via HTTPS (works with credential helper or token-embedded URL)
git clone https://github.com/owner/repo-name.git
# Clone into a specific directory
git clone https://github.com/owner/repo-name.git ./my-local-dir
# Shallow clone (faster for large repos)
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/owner/repo-name.git
# Clone a specific branch
git clone --branch develop https://github.com/owner/repo-name.git
# Clone via SSH (if SSH is configured)
git clone [email protected]:owner/repo-name.git
With gh (shorthand):
gh repo clone owner/repo-name
gh repo clone owner/repo-name -- --depth 1
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 517 lines · 17 tokens per session scan E d70d999ddf23
github-repo-management is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedroiff0/awesome-skills (1 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 4,070 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 83% identical to github-repo-management, differing in 20 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
dx-roaster
Brutally honest developer-experience audit for a GitHub repo. Scores 10 DX dimensions (time-to-first-success, README clarity, visual proof, install, quick-start, docs, examples, community, trust, marketing), writes a shareable roast in the requested tone (brutal/honest/kind), produces a prioritized action plan ranked…
mnemosyne-maintenance
Use when: upgrading Mnemosyne, diagnosing slow/hung consolidation (mnemosynesleep), fixing missing embeddings, or troubleshooting import/version mismatches.
review-workflow
A review workflow for GitHub pull requests and issues, including judging whether changes can be merged or an issue can be closed. It requires read-only review, REST API access, and testing changes in practice.
specification-compliance-review
Use this skill when an implementation is described as partial, passing, or complete and the task is to determine whether it actually satisfies an explicit specification. This is not a generic code review and not a re-run of the test suite. The central question is: does every normative requirement have both a correct…
dsh-requesting-code-review
A pre-commit code review process with separate checks for general quality and for matching the requested specification. A commit is a saved set of code changes in Git.
github-code-review
Perform code reviews on local changes before pushing, or review open PRs on GitHub. Most of this skill uses plain git — the gh/curl split only matters for PR-level interactions.