Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pedroiff0/awesome-skills --skill plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedroiff0/awesome-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedroiff0/awesome-skills/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedroiff0/awesome-skills/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedroiff0/awesome-skills/plan/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pedroiff0/awesome-skills/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pedroiff0/awesome-skills/plan.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.02123 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01061 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00425 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00212 |
Grade A, and why
plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
77% identical to writing-plans — 73 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 339 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Plan Mode
Use this skill when the user wants a plan instead of execution.
Core behavior
For this turn, you are planning only.
- Do not implement code.
- Do not edit project files except the plan markdown file.
- Do not run mutating terminal commands, commit, push, or perform external actions.
- You may inspect the repo or other context with read-only commands/tools when needed.
- Your deliverable is a markdown plan saved inside the active workspace under
.hermes/plans/.
Output requirements
Write a markdown plan that is concrete and actionable.
Include, when relevant:
- Goal
- Current context / assumptions
- Proposed approach
- Step-by-step plan
- Files likely to change
- Tests / validation
- Risks, tradeoffs, and open questions
If the task is code-related, include exact file paths, likely test targets, and verification steps.
Save location
Save the plan with write_file under:
.hermes/plans/YYYY-MM-DD_HHMMSS-<slug>.md
Treat that as relative to the active working directory / backend workspace. Hermes file tools are backend-aware, so using this relative path keeps the plan with the workspace on local, docker, ssh, modal, and daytona backends.
If the runtime provides a specific target path, use that exact path.
If not, create a sensible timestamped filename yourself under .hermes/plans/.
Interaction style
- If the request is clear enough, write the plan directly.
- If no explicit instruction accompanies
/plan, infer the task from the current conversation context. - If it is genuinely underspecified, ask a brief clarifying question instead of guessing.
- After saving the plan, reply briefly with what you planned and the saved path.
Writing the Plan Well
The rest of this skill is the craft of authoring a good implementation plan — the content that goes inside the markdown file above.
Overview
Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the implementer has zero context for the codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need: which files to touch, complete code, testing commands, docs to check, how to verify. Give them bite-sized tasks. DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 339 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 399038641c19
plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository pedroiff0/awesome-skills (1 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 2,123 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 77% identical to writing-plans, differing in 73 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
hermes-self-evaluation
Use this skill when the user asks to audit, review, or optimize Hermes's own performance — analyzing session data, skills, configuration, costs, and usage patterns to identify improvements, automation opportunities, and system optimizations.
svix-sending-webhooks
Everything for working with Svix webhooks: first-time setup (API key, SDK install, first message), Dispatch (sending webhooks to your customers), Ingest (receiving third-party webhooks), Applications, Channels, customer UIDs, idempotency, App Portal embedding, operational webhooks, the Svix CLI, and — only when the…
receiving-webhooks
General guidelines for building a robust webhook receiver/handler: verifying signatures, raw-body access, replay protection, async processing, retries and endpoint auto-disabling. Use whenever you write, review, or debug a handler that consumes incoming webhooks from any provider.
hermes-self-evaluation
Use this skill when the user asks to audit, review, or optimize Hermes's own performance — analyzing session data, skills, configuration, costs, and usage patterns to identify improvements, automation opportunities, and system optimizations.
hermes-tweet
Search Twitter/X, read tweet replies, look up users, monitor tweets, export followers, and gate X actions through Xquik.
ab-testing-experimentation
Use when designing and analyzing A/B testing experiments.