Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add Peeyushmeher/agent-agile/plugin install agent-agileWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/peeyushmeher/agent-agile/aa-new-project)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/peeyushmeher/agent-agile/aa-new-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/peeyushmeher/agent-agile/aa-new-project/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/peeyushmeher/agent-agile/aa-new-project"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/peeyushmeher/agent-agile/aa-new-project.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.00909 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00454 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00182 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00091 |
Grade A, and why
aa-new-project scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 36 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
aa-new-project
Resolve the Agent-Agile playbook root: use the first of these that exists — (1) ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/playbooks, (2) ./.claude/agent-agile/playbooks, (3) ./.agents/agent-agile/playbooks, (4) ~/.claude/agent-agile/playbooks, (5) ~/.agents/agent-agile/playbooks, (6) ./playbooks.
Read playbooks/planner.md sections The 8 intake questions, Pushback patterns, Drafting the plan, Research fan-out and the risk register, Slicing epics into stories, The worker-readiness test, and Extracting PREREQS, in full, and follow them exactly — do NOT re-derive or improvise the system.
Intake
If .planning/IDEA.md exists, read it and, per planner.md's Grill → intake mapping, confirm the pre-filled answers back to the user instead of re-asking them. Ask only the questions the grill didn't answer, plus the three it never answers (hard constraints, riskiest unknown, review-batch appetite) — always fresh. If IDEA.md does not exist, ask all 8 questions from scratch, one at a time, applying the pushback patterns to every thin answer before moving on.
After the eighth answer and before writing any files, deliver the split statement exactly as defined at the end of planner.md's The 8 intake questions — the "my part / your part" narration plus the process preview. It is a required step, not optional color.
Drafting
Draft the plan inline in this conversation, following Drafting the plan — this is the default; do not spawn a separate agent for this step unless the user asks for it. Produce, in order:
.planning/PROJECT.mdfromplaybooks/templates/PROJECT.md..planning/ROADMAP.mdfromplaybooks/templates/ROADMAP.md— every epic, riskiest first, one-line demo sentences; only the current epic (Epic 1) gets full detail.- If the roadmap draft is multi-epic, run Research fan-out and the risk register exactly as written (including its off-ramp): spawn
aa-researcher-domainandaa-researcher-ecosystemas parallel fresh subagents with the model configured for the smart tier in.planning/CONFIG.md(ask for tiers now if CONFIG.md doesn't exist yet), synthesize.planning/RESEARCH.mdfromplaybooks/templates/RESEARCH.md, then revise the roadmap draft against the risk register —[fixture: …]tags on epic lines, Epic 1/2 riskiest-first re-examination. - Slice Epic 1 into story cards per Slicing epics into stories, writing each from
playbooks/templates/STORY.md— including one fixture story per[fixture: …]tag on Epic 1. Apply The worker-readiness test to every card before calling it done. .planning/PREREQS.mdfromplaybooks/templates/PREREQS.mdper Extracting PREREQS, statuspendingfor every row..planning/CONFIG.mdfromplaybooks/templates/CONFIG.md— ask the user for smart_tier, cheap_tier, gate, and commercial if not already set..planning/STATE.mdfromplaybooks/templates/STATE.md, Phaseintake, pointing at PROJECT.md, ROADMAP.md, and Epic 1's stories.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 36 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 204226088d46
aa-new-project is a skill published in the GitHub repository Peeyushmeher/agent-agile (3 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 909 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
project-manager
This skill has been upgraded with agentic AI capabilities, OKR/KPI integration patterns, and async-first workflows based on 2026 PM best practices research.
github-project-management
Comprehensive GitHub project management with swarm-coordinated issue tracking, project board automation, and sprint planning.
team-okrs
An OKR tracking page for a quarter. OKRs, or objectives and key results, are goals paired with measurable results.
product-frameworks
Product management frameworks for business cases, market analysis, strategy, prioritization, OKRs/KPIs, personas, requirements, and user research. Use when building ROI projections, competitive analysis, RICE scoring, OKR trees, user personas, PRDs, or usability testing plans.
gr-product-dev-ops
🇺🇸 Your dev team ships features nobody asked for while user-reported bugs pile up for months. Operations blames engineering for ignoring users; engineering blames operations for not understanding technical constraints. This gives you the complete Product × Engineering × Operations alignment SOP — from unified…
github-project-management
Comprehensive GitHub project management with swarm-coordinated issue tracking, project board automation, and sprint planning.