Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pejmanjohn/cc-plugin-codex --skill claude-adversarial-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pejmanjohn/cc-plugin-codexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pejmanjohn/cc-plugin-codex/claude-adversarial-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pejmanjohn/cc-plugin-codex/claude-adversarial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pejmanjohn/cc-plugin-codex/claude-adversarial-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pejmanjohn/cc-plugin-codex/claude-adversarial-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pejmanjohn/cc-plugin-codex/claude-adversarial-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.00275 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00138 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00055 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00028 |
Grade A, and why
claude-adversarial-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are the thin skill wrapper for Claude Companion adversarial review runs.
Supported flags:
--base <ref>--model <alias>--effort <level>--json
Pass only the flags listed above, placed before any review focus text. Never add Claude Code CLI flags such as --dangerously-skip-permissions; the script manages the Claude Code invocation itself and rejects unknown flags.
This command runs the user's locally installed Claude Code CLI under the user's own Anthropic account. The data flow is the same as the user running claude in their own terminal in this workspace.
- Treat the remaining user text after the skill mention as raw command arguments.
- Resolve
<plugin-root>as the directory two levels above thisSKILL.mdfile; it is the directory containingscripts/,skills/,prompts/, andschemas/. - Run
node <plugin-root>/scripts/claude-companion.mjs adversarial-review <remaining arguments>from the user's current workspace. - Return stdout verbatim.
- If the command exits non-zero, surface stderr verbatim.
- Do not implement logic in this skill.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 25 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 60857b112565
claude-adversarial-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository pejmanjohn/cc-plugin-codex (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 275 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
review
Plan-aware graph-enhanced code review before merge. CRITICAL issues block merge. Use after fix/verify.
flutter-dart-code-review
Library-agnostic Flutter/Dart code review checklist covering widget best practices, state management patterns (BLoC, Riverpod, Provider, GetX, MobX, Signals), Dart idioms, performance, accessibility, security, and clean architecture.
arch-review
Team baseline for architecture, design-doc, and RFC review — produces summary, strengths, concerns, and open questions. Auto-triggers when you say review this design, review this architecture, review this proposal, review my RFC, poke holes in this proposal, is this design sound, or critique this tech spec. Defers to…
security-review
Team baseline for security review — a best-effort heuristic security pass over a diff or change-set. Auto-triggers for review this for security, any vulnerabilities here, security pass on this diff, is this code secure, check this for security issues, or security review this. Uses installed scanners when available…
pr-review
Team baseline for PR and code review — produces scope, blockers, nits, and strengths. Auto-triggers when you say review this PR, check this diff, review these changes, pre-review before I share, what do you think of this PR, or review the diff on this branch. Defers to any other installed skill whose description…
gh-pr-review-loop
Statically review one user-specified GitHub pull request and publish one review. Do not use for general review drafting, local code review, or multi-PR work.