Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add perasyudha/Nyxora --skill weights-and-biasesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/perasyudha/NyxoraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/perasyudha/nyxora/weights-and-biases)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/perasyudha/nyxora/weights-and-biases"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/perasyudha/nyxora/weights-and-biases/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/perasyudha/nyxora/weights-and-biases"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/perasyudha/nyxora/weights-and-biases.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.03273 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.01636 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00655 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00327 |
Grade A, and why
weights-and-biases scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to weights-and-biases — 18 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 595 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Weights & Biases: ML Experiment Tracking & MLOps
When to Use This Skill
Use Weights & Biases (W&B) when you need to:
- Track ML experiments with automatic metric logging
- Visualize training in real-time dashboards
- Compare runs across hyperparameters and configurations
- Optimize hyperparameters with automated sweeps
- Manage model registry with versioning and lineage
- Collaborate on ML projects with team workspaces
- Track artifacts (datasets, models, code) with lineage
Users: 200,000+ ML practitioners | GitHub Stars: 10.5k+ | Integrations: 100+
Installation
# Install W&B
pip install wandb
# Login (creates API key)
wandb login
# Or set API key programmatically
export WANDB_API_KEY=your_api_key_here
Quick Start
Basic Experiment Tracking
import wandb
# Initialize a run
run = wandb.init(
project="my-project",
config={
"learning_rate": 0.001,
"epochs": 10,
"batch_size": 32,
"architecture": "ResNet50"
}
)
# Training loop
for epoch in range(run.config.epochs):
# Your training code
train_loss = train_epoch()
val_loss = validate()
# Log metrics
wandb.log({
"epoch": epoch,
"train/loss": train_loss,
"val/loss": val_loss,
"train/accuracy": train_acc,
"val/accuracy": val_acc
})
# Finish the run
wandb.finish()
With PyTorch
import torch
import wandb
# Initialize
wandb.init(project="pytorch-demo", config={
"lr": 0.001,
"epochs": 10
})
# Access config
config = wandb.config
# Training loop
for epoch in range(config.epochs):
for batch_idx, (data, target) in enumerate(train_loader):
# Forward pass
output = model(data)
loss = criterion(output, target)
# Backward pass
optimizer.zero_grad()
loss.backward()
optimizer.step()
# Log every 100 batches
if batch_idx % 100 == 0:
wandb.log({
"loss": loss.item(),
"epoch": epoch,
"batch": batch_idx
})
# Save model
torch.save(model.state_dict(), "model.pth")
wandb.save("model.pth") # Upload to W&B
wandb.finish()
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 595 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A f34147f1d0a9
weights-and-biases is a skill published in the GitHub repository perasyudha/Nyxora (5 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 3,273 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to weights-and-biases, differing in 18 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
ai-discoverability-audit
Audit how a brand appears in AI-powered search (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini). Use when user mentions "AI search," "how do I show up in ChatGPT," "AI discoverability," "AEO," "LLM visibility," or wants to understand their brand's AI presence.
ai-wrapper-product
You know AI wrappers get a bad rap, but the good ones solve real problems. You build products where AI is the engine, not the gimmick. You understand prompt engineering is product development. You balance costs with user experience. You create AI products people actually pay for and use daily.
agent-evaluation
You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct" often has no single answer.
ai-product
You are an AI product engineer who has shipped LLM features to millions of users. You've debugged hallucinations at 3am, optimized prompts to reduce costs by 80%, and built safety systems that caught thousands of harmful outputs. You know that demos are easy and production is hard.
cdo-reviewer
Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Data Officer archetype, then saves a structured review document with a verdict, findings that cite the artifact, data and AI governance risks and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks for a CDO review, a data or AI governance…
"algo-nlp-lda"
"Implement LDA topic modeling to discover latent topics in document collections. Use this skill when the user needs to extract topics from a text corpus, categorize documents by theme, or explore thematic structure — even if they say 'what are the main topics', 'topic extraction', or 'document clustering by theme'.".