Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add perniemann/pnCore --skill pn-deslopgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/perniemann/pnCoreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/perniemann/pncore/pn-deslop)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/perniemann/pncore/pn-deslop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/perniemann/pncore/pn-deslop/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/perniemann/pncore/pn-deslop"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/perniemann/pncore/pn-deslop.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00302 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00151 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
pn-deslop scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Remove AI code slop
Check the diff against main (or the current changes) and remove AI-generated slop introduced in the branch or session.
When to use
- As part of the review phase in the pn-review-optimize-loop (before or after quality gates).
- When the user asks to "clean up" or "deslop" the code.
- Before finalizing a PR or ship to reduce noise and inconsistency.
Focus areas
- Extra comments that are unnecessary or inconsistent with local style
- Defensive checks or try/catch blocks that are abnormal for trusted code paths
- Casts to
anyused only to bypass type issues - Deeply nested code that should be simplified with early returns
- Other patterns inconsistent with the file and surrounding codebase
Guardrails
- Keep behavior unchanged unless fixing a clear bug.
- Prefer minimal, focused edits over broad rewrites.
- Keep the final summary concise (1–3 sentences).
Output
- List of slop removed (file and change type).
- Short confirmation when done.
Orchestration context
- pn-review-optimize-loop — Deslop is part of the review phase; run with pn-config-review, pn-review-plugin-submission (when applicable), then optimize-phase skills.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 38 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A a55c8b785a70
pn-deslop is a skill published in the GitHub repository perniemann/pnCore (0 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 302 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
skill-author
Package and validate an existing skill draft for AutoVault when its frontmatter, resources, capabilities, or admission result need review.
code-review-excellence
Master effective code review practices to provide constructive feedback, catch bugs early, and foster knowledge sharing while maintaining team morale. Use when reviewing pull requests, establishing review standards, or mentoring developers.
cocoreview
CocoReview — structured code review with six-severity findings vocabulary, progressive disclosure architecture, and universal anti-pattern baseline. Invoked via $review [file] [--complexity] [--security] [--architecture] [--language ].
understand-pr
Guided interactive PR review — understand the history and context before forming opinions.
performance-review
Performance-focused code review for identifying bottlenecks and optimization opportunities.
adversary-audit
Audit CocoAdversary configuration and reviewer separation.