Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add personamanagmentlayer/pcl --skill audit-expertgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/personamanagmentlayer/pclWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/audit-expert)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/audit-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/audit-expert/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/audit-expert"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/personamanagmentlayer/pcl/audit-expert.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00060 | $0.01214 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00607 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00243 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00121 |
Grade A, and why
audit-expert scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 194 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Audit Expert
Expert guidance for security auditing, compliance assessments, code reviews, vulnerability assessments, and regulatory compliance (SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS).
Core Concepts
Audit Types
- Security Audit: Vulnerability assessment, penetration testing
- Code Audit: Code review, static analysis, security patterns
- Compliance Audit: SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001
- Infrastructure Audit: Configuration review, access control
- Process Audit: SDLC, change management, incident response
Audit Frameworks
- OWASP ASVS (Application Security Verification Standard)
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework
- CIS Controls
- ISO 27001/27002
- SOC 2 Trust Service Criteria
Audit Process
- Planning and scoping
- Information gathering
- Vulnerability identification
- Risk assessment
- Reporting
- Remediation tracking
- Follow-up verification
Audit Reporting
Security Audit Report Template
class SecurityAuditReport {
constructor() {
this.findings = [];
this.summary = {
critical: 0,
high: 0,
medium: 0,
low: 0,
info: 0,
};
}
addFinding(finding) {
this.findings.push({
id: this.findings.length + 1,
severity: finding.severity,
title: finding.title,
description: finding.description,
location: finding.location,
recommendation: finding.recommendation,
references: finding.references || [],
cvssScore: finding.cvssScore,
status: 'open',
discoveredAt: new Date(),
});
this.summary[finding.severity]++;
}
generateReport() {
return {
reportDate: new Date(),
auditor: 'Security Team',
scope: this.scope,
summary: this.summary,
findings: this.findings.sort(
(a, b) =>
this.severityWeight(b.severity) - this.severityWeight(a.severity)
),
recommendations: this.generateRecommendations(),
};
}
severityWeight(severity) {
const weights = { critical: 5, high: 4, medium: 3, low: 2, info: 1 };
return weights[severity] || 0;
}
generateRecommendations() {
return [
'Address all critical and high severity findings immediately',
'Implement security code review process',
'Conduct regular penetration testing',
'Provide security training for developers',
'Establish vulnerability disclosure program',
];
}
}
// Usage
const audit = new SecurityAuditReport();
audit.addFinding({
severity: 'critical',
title: 'SQL Injection in User Search',
description: 'User search endpoint concatenates user input into SQL query',
location: 'src/controllers/users.js:45',
recommendation: 'Use parameterized queries or ORM with proper escaping',
references: ['CWE-89', 'OWASP A03:2021'],
cvssScore: 9.8,
});
const report = audit.generateReport();
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago Changed · -647 lines · +43 tokens per session b102edb184a4
- 6d ago First seen · 841 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A 311a590b7466
audit-expert is a skill published in the GitHub repository personamanagmentlayer/pcl (40 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 1,214 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
compliance-testing
Regulatory compliance testing for GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, SOC2, PCI-DSS and industry-specific regulations. Use when ensuring legal compliance, preparing for audits, or handling sensitive data.
GRC & Compliance
Governance, risk, and compliance — risk assessment and scoring, control mapping across NIST CSF 2.0 / ISO 27001:2022 / SOC 2 / CIS Controls v8, gap analysis, audit evidence preparation, and security policy generation.
performing-cryptographic-audit-of-application
A cryptographic audit systematically reviews an application's use of cryptographic primitives, protocols, and key management to identify vulnerabilities such as weak algorithms, insecure modes, hardco.
compliance-audit
Regulatory compliance auditing across GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2, and ISO frameworks with automated evidence collection and gap analysis. Use when conducting compliance assessments, preparing for certifications, or implementing regulatory controls.
fsi-compliance-checker
Maps code, architecture, and infrastructure changes to specific control IDs in PCI-DSS v4.0 and MAS TRM (Singapore financial regulator), producing an audit-traceable findings report with per-control remediation.
soc2-gap
Performs a SOC 2 Type II readiness gap analysis against AICPA Trust Services Criteria. Auto-invoked when discussing SOC 2 compliance, audit preparation, or security program maturity. Walks through all Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) plus selected additional criteria, identifies gaps, and produces a remediation roadmap with…