Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to personaxis/persona.md. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/personaxis/persona.md/main/.claude/skills/component-review/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/personaxis/persona.mdWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/personaxis/persona.md/component-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/personaxis/persona.md/component-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/personaxis/persona.md/component-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/personaxis/persona.md/component-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/personaxis/persona.md/component-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00035 | $0.00421 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
component-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Component Review
Use this skill when asked to review a React/TypeScript component before it merges, or to audit an existing component for design-system and accessibility compliance.
Steps
-
Read the component file(s) end to end before flagging anything - do not review based on a diff alone if the surrounding file changes the context (e.g. a prop added elsewhere in the file).
-
Check design-system tokens. Colors must resolve to semantic tokens (no raw hex, no off-list palette utilities). Spacing, radius, shadow, and border values must use the project's documented tokens. Typography must use the sanctioned type scale.
-
Check variant and prop contracts. The component should use an existing variant before introducing a new one. Props must match the documented component contract (names, types, defaults). Flag ad-hoc
classNameoverrides that fight the base component's styles. -
Check accessibility. All interactive elements reachable via keyboard, visible focus states matching the documented focus-ring spec, form controls with associated labels, WCAG AA contrast, decorative vs. meaningful icons handled correctly.
-
Check TypeScript conventions. Props typed with
interface(notany), no uncheckedascasts without a documented reason, exported types match what consumers need. -
For the full checklist with every sub-item, load
references/component-review-checklist.md- it is not duplicated here to avoid drift between this skill and the reference.
Output format
Each finding as [rule violated] -> [location] -> [minimal fix]. No preamble, no
summary unless requested. If the component passes every check, say so in one line.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 44 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 2755e46a71f1
component-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository personaxis/persona.md (8 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 35 tokens to every session and 421 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.
component-review compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| component-reviewpersonaxis/persona.md | Skill | 8 | 28d ago | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| 3d-web-experienceratnesh-maurya/cursor-claude-personas | Skill | 12 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code |
| chakra-ui-builderchakra-ui/chakra-ui | Skill | 41k | yesterday | MIT | A | 214 | Claude Code, Codex |
| tamagui-v6-configtamagui/tamagui | Skill | 14k | today | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code, Codex |
| tamagui-theme-generatortamagui/tamagui | Skill | 14k | today | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, Codex |
| frontend-ui-dark-tsmicrosoft/skills | Skill | 3.2k | yesterday | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code |
| cobejsMengTo/Skills | Skill | 7.3k | yesterday | MIT | A | 31 | Claude Code, Codex |