Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/peterhdd/agent-skills/engineering-senior-developernpx skills add PeterHdd/agent-skills --skill engineering-senior-developergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PeterHdd/agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/peterhdd/agent-skills/engineering-senior-developer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/peterhdd/agent-skills/engineering-senior-developer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/peterhdd/agent-skills/engineering-senior-developer.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00067 | $0.04630 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.02315 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00926 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00463 |
Grade A, and why
engineering-senior-developer scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
- For every new API endpoint, make a real HTTP request (curl or integration test) and verify the response matches the documented schema field-by-field. How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 182 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Senior Development Guide
Overview
This guide covers the workflow, standards, and patterns for delivering production-grade software across web, backend, mobile, and platform work. Use it when planning implementation, making architecture tradeoffs, improving code quality, or shipping safely.
Delivery Workflow
1. Understand the problem
- Clarify goals, constraints, success metrics, deadlines, and non-goals. If any of these are missing, ask before writing code — never assume.
- Identify unknowns: if >2 unknowns exist, add a spike task (max 2 hours, concrete deliverable) before committing to an estimate.
- Propose a minimal viable technical approach first. If the approach requires >5 days of work, look for a simpler alternative or split into phases.
- Define acceptance criteria before implementation. Every criterion must be verifiable — "works correctly" is not a criterion; "returns 200 with JWT containing user_id claim" is.
2. Plan implementation
- Break work into small, testable milestones. Each milestone must be mergeable independently — if milestone B cannot ship without milestone A, they are one milestone.
- If a change touches >5 files, write a 1-paragraph plan before starting. If >15 files, write a design doc (see references/design-docs.md).
- Plan rollback: every database migration must be reversible. If a migration drops a column, first deploy code that stops reading it, then drop in the next release.
- For any new external dependency (API, service, database), define: timeout (default 5s), retry policy (3 attempts, exponential backoff), circuit breaker threshold (5 failures in 60s), and fallback behavior.
3. Implement and verify
- Functions >40 lines: split. Files >300 lines: split. If a function takes >4 parameters, introduce a config/options object.
- Test at the right level: pure logic = unit test. API endpoints = integration test. Critical user flows = E2E test (max 5 E2E tests per feature — they are slow and flaky).
- Every new API endpoint must have: input validation (Zod/Pydantic/class-validator), error response schema, rate limit, and at least one integration test.
- Every database query on a table with >10k rows must have an index. Run EXPLAIN ANALYZE and reject sequential scans on large tables.
- Never catch an error and swallow it silently. Log it with context (operation, input, correlation ID) or re-throw. Catch only errors you can handle.
- Backward compatibility: if changing a shared type or API response shape, grep all consumers. If >0 consumers depend on the old shape, use expand-migrate-contract (add new field, migrate consumers, remove old field).
What ships with it
9 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
- references/architecture-decisions.md 15 KB
- references/code-examples.md 3.0 KB
- references/code-review.md 9.1 KB
- references/debugging-strategies.md 16 KB
- references/design-docs.md 8.0 KB
- references/performance-profiling.md 15 KB
- references/production-patterns.md 9.7 KB
- references/team-patterns.md 15 KB
- scripts/review_checklist.py 11 KB runs code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 182 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A b26b951c4458
engineering-senior-developer is a skill published in the GitHub repository PeterHdd/agent-skills (11 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 4,630 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…