Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to phantom/phantom-connect-sdk. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/phantom/phantom-connect-sdk/main/.claude/skills/fix-audit/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/phantom/phantom-connect-sdkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/phantom/phantom-connect-sdk/fix-audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/phantom/phantom-connect-sdk/fix-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/phantom/phantom-connect-sdk/fix-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/phantom/phantom-connect-sdk/fix-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/phantom/phantom-connect-sdk/fix-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00864 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00346 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00173 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00086 |
Grade A, and why
fix-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Skill: fix-audit
Implement findings from the latest audit report for a package, one item at a time.
Arguments: <package-name> [developer notes] — package name plus optional free-text notes (e.g. "only fix #1", "skip #2, needs discussion", "fix all but use X pattern for #1 instead").
Phase 0 — Load
Find the most recent audit/*-{package-name}*.md (sort by filename date descending). Record this exact filename — it is the audit file for all later steps. Extract unresolved Critical items — an item is resolved if it contains **Resolved or has strikethrough text.
If no unresolved Criticals exist, check developer notes — if they say "important", work the Important tier instead.
Print the final work list before starting any changes.
For each item (work sequentially — fully complete one before starting the next)
Step 1 — Read before touching
Re-read the relevant source files in packages/{package-name}/src/. Verify the bug still exists at the exact file:line the audit references. Apply developer notes if they override the implementation approach.
Step 2 — Implement
Minimal change that fixes exactly what the audit item describes. Rules:
- Never use TypeScript escape hatches (
as any,@ts-ignore,@ts-expect-errorwithout justification) - Never add
eslint-disablecomments to hide a warning caused by the fix - Never skip writing tests
Step 3 — Self-review
Before running tests, ask:
- Does the fix make sense in the full application context?
- Are callers in other packages affected? Check usages with grep across
packages/andexamples/. - Does it change a public contract — exported type, hook return shape, event payload?
- Is there anything the audit item missed that makes the fix incomplete?
Step 3.5 — Write tests first
Write a test that would have failed before the fix and passes now. Assert the exact corrected behaviour. Place the test in the package's existing test file or create a new *.test.ts alongside the changed file.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 112 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 89b9dfa764d0
fix-audit is a skill published in the GitHub repository phantom/phantom-connect-sdk (165 stars, last pushed 7d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 864 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when debugging a failing test, build error, or runtime issue that isn't immediately obvious. Guides a 4-phase root cause analysis instead of random fix attempts.
log-error-digest
Analyze log files to troubleshoot errors, identify peak error periods, and produce error clustering, frequency statistics, and time distribution reports. Supports JSON, syslog, and Nginx formats with automatic detection. Use when a user uploads a .log file and asks to analyze errors, find patterns, debug issues, or…
cwv-optimizer
Diagnose and fix Core Web Vitals issues on AEM Edge Delivery Services pages. Goes deeper than generic CWV advice by understanding EDS-specific performance patterns including the 100KB LCP budget, E-L-D loading phases, block rendering behavior, and third-party script impact. Produces specific fixes for LCP, CLS, and…
incident-response-incident-response
Coordinate production incident triage, mitigation, investigation, recovery, and follow-up. Use when responding to outages or other incidents that require structured operational coordination.
ci-fixer
CI failures - read error, minimal fix, verify.
diagnosing-missing-recordings
Diagnoses why a session recording is missing or was not captured. Use when a user asks why a session has no replay, why recordings aren't appearing, or wants to troubleshoot session replay capture issues for a specific session ID or across their project. Covers SDK diagnostic signals, project settings, sampling…