Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/photostructure/coding-skills/reviewnpx skills add photostructure/coding-skills --skill reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/photostructure/coding-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/photostructure/coding-skills/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/photostructure/coding-skills/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/photostructure/coding-skills/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00060 | $0.00492 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00030 | $0.00246 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00098 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Code Review
Leaf-mode guard
If the task identifies your role as leaf-reviewer or sets
delegation-budget: 0, read and follow
references/single-pass.md, complete one review
yourself, return the report to the caller, and stop.
Run the review
Read and follow references/single-pass.md, then
references/orchestration.md. The latter's
user-facing response rules replace the former's leaf return behavior.
Scratch files
Any copy this workflow makes — of the repo, of a build-output directory, of a file you replay edits onto — belongs in the operating system's temporary directory, in a fresh directory named for the project and the purpose. Never inside the checkout, and never under a home directory.
Delete it before you finish. A repo or build-output copy runs to gigabytes, nothing reaps a home directory, and the out-of-disk failure that eventually follows surfaces somewhere unrelated — a test suite that hangs, a build that dies mid-link — costing far more to diagnose than the copy ever saved.
Adapting for your project
- Name your standards explicitly in
references/single-pass.md—AGENTS.md, optionalCLAUDE.md,docs/DESIGN-PRINCIPLES.md— in place of the generic "relevant design documents". - Add project-specific "what to look for" items to the same file, e.g. "new public APIs have rate limiting", "DB queries use parameterized inputs", "error messages don't leak internal paths".
- Tune the exclusion list there if your team does want style or refactor feedback. The default is strict because noise is the bigger problem.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 46 lines · 60 tokens per session scan A 2516cfe3b9b4
review is a skill published in the GitHub repository photostructure/coding-skills (3 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 60 tokens to every session and 492 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
decision-records
Creates, supersedes and validates decision records (ADRs) against the convention a collection already follows, instead of imposing a published one. Use when the user wants to record a decision, write an ADR, supersede an existing decision, audit or lint a decisions folder, check that an ADR index is in sync, or asks…
github-pr-review
Handles PR review comments and feedback resolution. Use when user wants to resolve PR comments, handle review feedback, fix review comments, address PR review, check review status, respond to reviewer, verify PR readiness, review PR comments, analyze review feedback, evaluate PR comments, assess review suggestions, or…
privacy-guard
Prevents private infrastructure details (node hostnames, internal project names, local usernames and personal emails, absolute home paths, private and VPN IP ranges) from leaking into public repositories through commits, PRs, docs or release artifacts. Use when working in a public or soon-to-be-public repo, before…
github-pr-creation
Creates GitHub Pull Requests with automated validation and task tracking. Use when user wants to create PR, open pull request, submit for review, or check if ready for PR. Analyzes commits, validates task completion, generates Conventional Commits title and description, suggests labels. NOTE - for merging existing…
github-pr-merge
Merges GitHub Pull Requests after validating pre-merge checklist. Use when user wants to merge PR, close PR, finalize PR, complete merge, approve and merge, or execute merge. Runs pre-merge validation (tests, lint, CI, comments), confirms with user, merges with proper format, handles post-merge cleanup.
git-commit
Creates git commits following Conventional Commits format with type/scope/subject. Use when user wants to commit changes, create commit, save work, or stage and commit. Enforces project-specific conventions from CLAUDE.md.