coordinator-mode

A coordination mode for splitting a large request among worker agents and combining their results. It separates parallel research, central decision-making, and ordered code changes.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for dividing projects into research, build, and checking tasks, running independent reads together, sequencing writes, and assembling one final answer.
Why use it?
It helps manage work that spans several areas without losing track of findings or allowing conflicting changes.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/coordinator-mode
Any agent
npx skills add phuonghx/aim-cli --skill coordinator-mode
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/phuonghx/aim-cli

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 82 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,684 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00082 $0.01684
Opus 5 $0.00041 $0.00842
Sonnet 5 $0.00016 $0.00337
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00168

Measured yesterday against content hash f3e399bacee2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coordinator-mode scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

aim/templates/aim-agents/skills/coordinator-mode/SKILL.md · 182 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 182 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Coordinator Mode

In this mode you stop acting as a builder and start acting as a director. A request arrives, you split it into pieces, hand the pieces to worker agents, and stitch their returns back together. The workers touch the code; you do the thinking, the routing, and the assembly.

Hold that boundary firmly. The moment the coordinator starts editing files directly, the value of orchestration evaporates.

The Six Moves

A coordinated run cycles through the same six moves every time:

  1. Split the request into worker-sized subtasks.
  2. Tag each subtask as research, build, or check.
  3. Send the workers out — reads concurrently, writes one at a time.
  4. Watch for the completion signals to arrive.
  5. Merge the returns into a single coherent result.
  6. Confirm nothing is missing before you answer the user.

Phases And Their Concurrency

Group the subtasks into phases. Each phase has its own rule about whether workers may overlap:

Phase Goal Can overlap? Who runs it
Research Read the codebase, collect facts Yes, freely Read-only workers
Synthesis Weigh findings, pick an approach No — this is you The coordinator alone
Build Edit files, apply changes One writer per file group Write-capable workers
Check Run tests, lint, validate Yes, when independent Verification workers

The Synthesis phase is the one people skip, and skipping it is the most common cause of bad output. Research that flows straight into building means workers act on raw facts nobody reasoned over. Always stop and think between gathering and doing.

What May Run Together

Reads are cheap to parallelize because they collide with nothing:

  • Several workers reading different parts of the tree
  • A performance pass and a security pass over the same read-only code
  • A linter and a test runner that share no state
  • Workers crawling separate folders

Writes and dependencies force a single file:

Read the full file on GitHub · 182 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 182 lines · 82 tokens per session scan A f3e399bacee2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coordinator-mode is a skill published in the GitHub repository phuonghx/aim-cli (1 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 82 tokens to every session and 1,684 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

hs-release

Cut a core Hindsight release (vX.Y.Z) and open the changelog + blog PR. Use when asked to cut/start a release, bump the version, or publish a new Hindsight version.

vectorize-io/hindsight · 45 tokens

hindsight-local

Store user preferences, learnings from tasks, and procedure outcomes. Use to remember what works and recall context before new tasks. (user).

vectorize-io/hindsight · 32 tokens

research-repository

Build a repository that makes findings findable, reusable, and cumulative across teams. Use when the same research keeps getting redone. For synthesising one study, use affinity-diagram.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 43 tokens

design-negotiation

Advocate for design quality, scope, and timeline with partners and leadership using evidence and shared goals. Use in the conversation itself. For the commercial vocabulary behind it, use business-design (ux-strategy).

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 48 tokens

user-persona

Build research-grounded personas with goals, frustrations, and behavioural patterns. Use when decisions need a consistent user reference. For one session's emotional snapshot use empathy-map; for motivation framing use jobs-to-be-done.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 50 tokens

version-control-strategy

Define version control for design files, components, and libraries — branching, naming, and release. Use when file history is chaotic. For design system contribution rules, use design-system-governance (design-systems).

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 50 tokens