Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add phuonghx/aim-cli --skill simplify-codegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/phuonghx/aim-cliWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00101 | $0.01007 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00040 | $0.00403 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00201 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00101 |
Grade A, and why
simplify-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Simplify Code
Code costs more to read than to write. Treat every extra layer, branch, and clever trick as a debt that future readers pay interest on. Remove it unless it earns its keep.
The one rule that governs the rest
Simplicity is not a style preference; it is the absence of structure that does not pull its weight. Keep an abstraction only when you can name the concrete benefit it provides right now. "We might need it later" is not a benefit you have today.
What to hunt for
Indirection that adds nothing
| You see | You probably want |
|---|---|
| A class that forwards every call to another object | The inner object, used directly |
| A factory that only ever builds one concrete type | A plain constructor call |
| An interface with exactly one implementer | The concrete class, interface deleted |
| A "strategy" with a single strategy | An ordinary function |
| A base class extended by one subclass | The two folded together |
| An options struct holding two fields | Two positional arguments |
Code nothing reaches
- Imports referenced nowhere
- Branches that can never be true (confirm via tests before deleting)
- Old code left behind in comments — version control already remembers it
- Variables assigned but never read; functions called from nowhere
- Stale
TODOnotes — act on them or file a ticket, then delete - Toggles guarding a feature that already shipped to everyone
Pyramids of nesting
Flatten with guard clauses and pipeline-style collection methods.
# Tangled: four levels before any real work happens
def notify_active(payload):
if payload:
if payload.get("recipients"):
for r in payload["recipients"]:
if r.get("subscribed"):
send(r)
# Flat: bail early, then express the intent in one chain
def notify_active(payload):
recipients = (payload or {}).get("recipients") or []
for r in recipients:
if r.get("subscribed"):
send(r)
Functions that ask for too much
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 786cb9b5e27c
simplify-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository phuonghx/aim-cli (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 1,007 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
auto-review
Use this skill to configure and understand the built-in auto-review plugin (wstack-auto-review) that fires automated code review subagents on every code change during a session. Triggers: user says "auto review", "otomatik review", "auto code review", "her değişiklikte review", "/auto-review".
codex-adversarial-review
Use this skill to conduct aggressive, adversarial code reviews on git changes, branches, or PRs to detect critical edge cases, race conditions, security holes, and data loss risks. Triggers: user mentions "adversarial review", "break the code", "find vulnerabilities", "security audit PR", "race condition check", "ship…
code-review
Use this skill when asked to review code changes — a pull request, a branch, a commit range, or the current diff — for correctness, security, and maintainability before they merge. Triggers: user says "review", "code review", "review this PR", "review my changes", "look over the diff", "is this ready to merge", "PR…
chimera
Use this skill for post-session code quality review of files added or modified during a WrongStack session. It runs automatically when a session ends, and on demand. Trigger on the explicit vocabulary — "review", "code review", "quality check", "post-session review", "chimeric review", "chimera" — and on the task…
code-quality
Find and remove unused code, ghost dependencies, unnecessary coupling and bundle waste with source-confirmed reachability. Use when cleaning exports or packages, reviewing Knip output or reducing dead code; use security-scanner for security findings and preserve public/dynamic entrypoints.
verify
Answer "is this shippable / done?" with evidence before a commit or PR — fires on "verify", "is this done", "ready to ship?", pre-commit or pre-PR. Part of the Agentsmith harness; runs the project's verify phases and never claims "passing" without showing the output (R5).