simplify-code

simplify-code is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from phuonghx/aim-cli. It costs 101 tokens per session (1,007 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A code-review guide for making working code easier to read by removing unnecessary branches, layers, abstractions, and parameters while preserving its behaviour.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when reviewing over-engineered files, deleting unused code, flattening needless indirection, simplifying control flow, or replacing abstractions that have only one real use.
Why use it?
It addresses code that is harder to understand because it contains structure that adds no current benefit. Simpler code usually gives future maintainers less to trace and maintain.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it when reviewing over-engineered files, deleting unused code, flattening needless indirection, simplifying control flow, or replacing abstractions that have only one real use.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add phuonghx/aim-cli --skill simplify-code
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/phuonghx/aim-cli

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for simplify-code

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for simplify-code

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/phuonghx/aim-cli/simplify-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 101 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,007 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00101 $0.01007
Opus 5.5 $0.00040 $0.00403
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00020 $0.00201
Haiku 4.5 $0.00010 $0.00101

Measured 1mo ago against content hash 786cb9b5e27c, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

simplify-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

aim/templates/aim-agents/skills/simplify-code/SKILL.md · 109 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 109 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Simplify Code

Code costs more to read than to write. Treat every extra layer, branch, and clever trick as a debt that future readers pay interest on. Remove it unless it earns its keep.

The one rule that governs the rest

Simplicity is not a style preference; it is the absence of structure that does not pull its weight. Keep an abstraction only when you can name the concrete benefit it provides right now. "We might need it later" is not a benefit you have today.

What to hunt for

Indirection that adds nothing

You see You probably want
A class that forwards every call to another object The inner object, used directly
A factory that only ever builds one concrete type A plain constructor call
An interface with exactly one implementer The concrete class, interface deleted
A "strategy" with a single strategy An ordinary function
A base class extended by one subclass The two folded together
An options struct holding two fields Two positional arguments

Code nothing reaches

  • Imports referenced nowhere
  • Branches that can never be true (confirm via tests before deleting)
  • Old code left behind in comments — version control already remembers it
  • Variables assigned but never read; functions called from nowhere
  • Stale TODO notes — act on them or file a ticket, then delete
  • Toggles guarding a feature that already shipped to everyone

Pyramids of nesting

Flatten with guard clauses and pipeline-style collection methods.

# Tangled: four levels before any real work happens
def notify_active(payload):
    if payload:
        if payload.get("recipients"):
            for r in payload["recipients"]:
                if r.get("subscribed"):
                    send(r)

# Flat: bail early, then express the intent in one chain
def notify_active(payload):
    recipients = (payload or {}).get("recipients") or []
    for r in recipients:
        if r.get("subscribed"):
            send(r)

Functions that ask for too much

Read the full file on GitHub · 109 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 109 lines · 101 tokens per session scan A 786cb9b5e27c

Subscribe to this mod's changes

simplify-code is a skill published in the GitHub repository phuonghx/aim-cli (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 101 tokens to every session and 1,007 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

auto-review

Use this skill to configure and understand the built-in auto-review plugin (wstack-auto-review) that fires automated code review subagents on every code change during a session. Triggers: user says "auto review", "otomatik review", "auto code review", "her değişiklikte review", "/auto-review".

WrongStack/WrongStack · 67 tokens

codex-adversarial-review

Use this skill to conduct aggressive, adversarial code reviews on git changes, branches, or PRs to detect critical edge cases, race conditions, security holes, and data loss risks. Triggers: user mentions "adversarial review", "break the code", "find vulnerabilities", "security audit PR", "race condition check", "ship…

WrongStack/WrongStack · 83 tokens

code-review

Use this skill when asked to review code changes — a pull request, a branch, a commit range, or the current diff — for correctness, security, and maintainability before they merge. Triggers: user says "review", "code review", "review this PR", "review my changes", "look over the diff", "is this ready to merge", "PR…

WrongStack/WrongStack · 86 tokens

chimera

Use this skill for post-session code quality review of files added or modified during a WrongStack session. It runs automatically when a session ends, and on demand. Trigger on the explicit vocabulary — "review", "code review", "quality check", "post-session review", "chimeric review", "chimera" — and on the task…

WrongStack/WrongStack · 182 tokens

code-quality

Find and remove unused code, ghost dependencies, unnecessary coupling and bundle waste with source-confirmed reachability. Use when cleaning exports or packages, reviewing Knip output or reducing dead code; use security-scanner for security findings and preserve public/dynamic entrypoints.

WrongStack/WrongStack · 55 tokens

verify

Answer "is this shippable / done?" with evidence before a commit or PR — fires on "verify", "is this done", "ready to ship?", pre-commit or pre-PR. Part of the Agentsmith harness; runs the project's verify phases and never claims "passing" without showing the output (R5).

PromptPartner/agentsmith · 69 tokens