claude-code-system-prompts is a repository that records the system prompts, tool descriptions, agent prompts, and utility prompts used by Claude Code. It serves people who want to inspect how Claude Code structures its built-in agents and tools across releases. The catalogue instruction provides access to material documenting that workflow.
Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts --skill skill-verify-server-api-changes-example-for-verifygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-promptsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/piebald-ai/claude-code-system-prompts/skill-verify-server-api-changes-example-for-verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/piebald-ai/claude-code-system-prompts/skill-verify-server-api-changes-example-for-verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/piebald-ai/claude-code-system-prompts/skill-verify-server-api-changes-example-for-verify.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00588 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00294 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00118 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
Grade A, and why
Skill: Verify server/API changes (example for Verify skill) scanned grade A with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
The handle is `curl` (or equivalent). The evidence is the response. Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- Skill: Verify server/API changes (example for Verify skill) — 98% identical, 26 lines differ
What it actually says
Verifying a server/API change
The handle is curl (or equivalent). The evidence is the response.
Pattern
- Start the server (background, with a readiness poll - see below)
curlthe route the diff touches, with inputs that hit the changed branch- Capture the full response (status + headers + body)
- Compare to expected
Lifecycle
If there's a run-skill it handles this. If not:
<start-command> &> /tmp/server.log &
SERVER_PID=$!
for i in {1..30}; do curl -sf localhost:PORT/health >/dev/null && break; sleep 1; done
# ... your curls ...
kill $SERVER_PID
No readiness endpoint? Poll the route you're about to test until it stops returning connection-refused, then add a beat.
Worked example
Diff: adds a Retry-After header to 429 responses in rateLimit.ts.
Claim (PR body): "clients can now back off correctly."
Inference: hitting the rate limit should now return Retry-After: <n>
in the response headers. It didn't before.
Plan:
- Start server
- Hit the rate-limited endpoint enough times to trigger 429
- Check the 429 response has
Retry-Afterheader - Check the value is a positive integer
Execute:
# trigger the limit - 10 fast requests, limit is 5/sec per the diff
for i in {1..10}; do curl -s -o /dev/null -w "%{http_code}\n" localhost:3000/api/thing; done
# -> 200 200 200 200 200 429 429 429 429 429
# capture the 429 headers
curl -si localhost:3000/api/thing | head -20
# -> HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
# -> Retry-After: 12
# -> ...
Verdict: PASS - Retry-After: 12 present, positive integer.
What FAIL looks like
- Header absent -> the diff didn't take effect, or you're not actually hitting the 429 path (check the status code first)
- Header present but value is
NaN/undefined/ negative -> the logic is wrong - You got 200s all the way through -> you never triggered the changed path. Tighten the request burst or check the rate limit config.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 69 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 003ce383a9f1
Skill: Verify server/API changes (example for Verify skill) is a skill published in the GitHub repository Piebald-AI/claude-code-system-prompts (12,596 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 588 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 1 finding (makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-05.
Other skills, from other repositories
server-side-calls
Call tRPC procedures directly from server code using t.createCallerFactory() and router.createCaller(context) for integration testing, internal server logic, and custom API endpoints. Catch TRPCError and extract HTTP status with getHTTPStatusCodeFromError(). Error handling via onError option.
mem0-test-integration
Verify a Mem0 integration produced by /mem0-integrate. Runs in the same workspace on the same branch (loose coupling) — installs dependencies, runs the repo's native test suite, then exercises a real end-to-end smoke flow against the user's API key. Produces a scorecard. TRIGGER when: user has just run /mem0-integrate…
prowler-test-api
Testing patterns for Prowler API: JSON:API, Celery tasks, RLS isolation, RBAC. Trigger: When writing tests for api/ (JSON:API requests/assertions, cross-tenant isolation, RBAC, Celery tasks, viewsets/serializers).
python-sdk
Implement or modify Python SDK behavior under python/composio, including tools, toolkits, sessions, auth configs, connected accounts, client integration, and shared Python models. Use for Python core runtime/API work; pair with python-testing and cross-sdk-parity when TypeScript must match.
convex-test
Generate convex-test tests for the app's Convex functions.
voiden
Create and edit Voiden .void files for API testing. Covers the .void file format and all enabled extension block types.