Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/pigfoot/claude-code-hubs/commitnpx skills add pigfoot/claude-code-hubs --skill commitgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pigfoot/claude-code-hubsWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00044 | $0.01907 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00954 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00381 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00191 |
Grade A, and why
commit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 338 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Commit Skill
Creates well-formatted commits following conventional commit standards.
When to Use
- User says "commit", "commit these changes", or uses
/commit - After code changes are ready to be committed
- Need help with commit message formatting
- Want automatic detection of multi-concern changes
Core Features
- GPG signing with cached passphrase (if
$GPG_PASSPHRASEset) - Staged vs unstaged detection - commits only staged files when present
- Split suggestions - analyzes diffs for multiple logical changes
- Conventional commits -
<type>: <description>format - Pre-commit hook integration - respects Husky/other hooks
- Always --signoff - DCO compliance
Context
- Current git status: !
git status - Current git diff (staged and unstaged): !
git diff HEAD - Current branch: !
git branch --show-current - Recent commits: !
git log --oneline -10
Process
⚠️ CRITICAL: ALWAYS start with Step 1 (Environment Check) before attempting any commit
1. Environment Check (MANDATORY FIRST STEP)
MUST cache GPG passphrase if available
# If GPG_PASSPHRASE is set, cache it to gpg-agent
if [ -n "$GPG_PASSPHRASE" ]; then
gpg --batch --pinentry-mode loopback \
--passphrase-file <(echo "$GPG_PASSPHRASE") \
--clearsign >/dev/null 2>&1 <<< "test" && echo "✅ GPG passphrase cached" || echo "❌ GPG cache failed"
else
echo "⚠️ GPG_PASSPHRASE not set - GPG signing will prompt for passphrase (and fail in non-interactive environment)"
fi
Why this matters
- GPG_PASSPHRASE purpose: Allow GPG to sign automatically without interactive password prompt
- If GPG_PASSPHRASE is set → Must cache first, otherwise git commit --gpg-sign will fail
- If GPG_PASSPHRASE not set → GPG will attempt interactive password prompt (fails in Claude Code environment)
GPG signing decision
- Whether to use --gpg-sign should be determined by project policy or git config
- In this project: always use --gpg-sign (assumes GPG is configured)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 338 lines · 44 tokens per session scan A 71ef20062649
commit is a skill published in the GitHub repository pigfoot/claude-code-hubs (5 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 44 tokens to every session and 1,907 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…