Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to PIsberg/vibetags. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/PIsberg/vibetags/main/.claude/skills/speckit-git-validate/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PIsberg/vibetagsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pisberg/vibetags/speckit-git-validate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pisberg/vibetags/speckit-git-validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pisberg/vibetags/speckit-git-validate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pisberg/vibetags/speckit-git-validate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pisberg/vibetags/speckit-git-validate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00493 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00197 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00099 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
speckit-git-validate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 29d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to speckit-git-validate — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Validate Feature Branch
Validate that the current Git branch follows the expected feature branch naming conventions.
Prerequisites
- Check if Git is available by running
git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null - If Git is not available, output a warning and skip validation:
[specify] Warning: Git repository not detected; skipped branch validation
Validation Rules
Get the current branch name:
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
The branch name must match one of these patterns:
- Sequential:
^[0-9]{3,}-(e.g.,001-feature-name,042-fix-bug,1000-big-feature) - Timestamp:
^[0-9]{8}-[0-9]{6}-(e.g.,20260319-143022-feature-name)
Execution
If on a feature branch (matches either pattern):
- Output:
✓ On feature branch: <branch-name> - Check if the corresponding spec directory exists under
specs/:- For sequential branches, look for
specs/<prefix>-*where prefix matches the numeric portion - For timestamp branches, look for
specs/<prefix>-*where prefix matches theYYYYMMDD-HHMMSSportion
- For sequential branches, look for
- If spec directory exists:
✓ Spec directory found: <path> - If spec directory missing:
⚠ No spec directory found for prefix <prefix>
If NOT on a feature branch:
- Output:
✗ Not on a feature branch. Current branch: <branch-name> - Output:
Feature branches should be named like: 001-feature-name or 20260319-143022-feature-name
Graceful Degradation
If Git is not installed or the directory is not a Git repository:
- Check the
SPECIFY_FEATUREenvironment variable as a fallback - If set, validate that value against the naming patterns
- If not set, skip validation with a warning
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 29d ago First seen · 55 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 5bc31670a01c
speckit-git-validate is a skill published in the GitHub repository PIsberg/vibetags (25 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 493 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to speckit-git-validate, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
release-pr-review
Review pass on an open release PR (release/ → main) — the step between git-wrapup and release-and-publish when a project releases in gated release PR mode. Reads the PR's commit range through the code-simplifier lens plus a correctness review, verifies whatever an automated reviewer left on the PR, lands fixes as…
version-control-strategy
Define version control for design files, components, and libraries — branching, naming, and release. Use when file history is chaotic. For design system contribution rules, use design-system-governance (design-systems).
git-commit
Generate conventional commit messages for Java projects. Use when user says "commit", "create commit", "commit changes", or after completing code changes that need to be committed.
debug-systematic
Systematic 4-phase debugging methodology for complex, intermittent, or mysterious issues. Use when investigating bugs, race conditions, or unexplained failures.
monorepo-navigator
Inspect or improve Turborepo, Nx, pnpm, or Lerna monorepos: package boundaries, dependency graphs, selective tests, caching, and migrations.
github-ops
GitHub remote operations and README authoring: repo creation, metadata, releases, issue/PR management with preview-before-send, README as a landing page (badge row, features-as-benefits, screenshots, Recent Updates), and read-only security auditing. Triggers on: write a README, improve the README, README badges…