Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add pitimon/8-habit-ai-dev --skill workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pitimon/8-habit-ai-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/pitimon/8-habit-ai-dev/workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pitimon/8-habit-ai-dev/workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pitimon/8-habit-ai-dev/workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/pitimon/8-habit-ai-dev/workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/pitimon/8-habit-ai-dev/workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00036 | $0.01058 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00423 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00212 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 81 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
7-Step Workflow Guide (เดินทีละก้าว)
All Habits | Anti-pattern: Jumping straight to code without planning, reviewing, or monitoring
Process
Walk the user through each step. For each step: explain what it does, ask whether to invoke or skip, and track progress.
The 7 Steps
| Step | Skill | Purpose | Skip if... |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | /research | Investigate before specifying | Requirements already clear, well-understood domain |
| 1 | /requirements | Define what, why, who | Single-line fix, formatting change |
| 2 | /design | Architecture decisions | Bug fix in existing pattern, no architecture impact |
| 3 | /breakdown | Atomic tasks | Single task, scope already clear |
| 4 | /build-brief | Context before coding | Familiar code, context still fresh |
| 5 | /review-ai | Audit before commit | Never skip |
| 6 | /deploy-guide | Staging first | No deployment involved |
| 7 | /monitor-setup | Observability after deploy | Monitoring already comprehensive |
When the problem statement itself is fuzzy (before you know what to research), use superpowers:brainstorming from the claude-plugins-official:superpowers plugin — it ships a hard-gate collaborative design session with spec-doc-to-git. v2.4.1 removed our own /brainstorm skill in favor of that stronger equivalent (see ADR-006).
For Each Step
- Announce: "Step N: [skill] — [purpose]"
- Ask: "Invoke /[skill], skip (with reason), or stop here?"
- If invoke: Run the skill with the user's feature context
- If skip: Record the reason — honest skipping is fine, lazy skipping is not
- Move to next step
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 73689a4073ee
- 1mo ago First seen · 81 lines · 36 tokens per session scan A 9bbf15b7b987
workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository pitimon/8-habit-ai-dev (3 stars, last pushed 11d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 36 tokens to every session and 1,058 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
crap-analyzer
Use to produce a risk-based refactor + test plan for recently-changed code on a diff/branch/PR by computing CRAP (complexity × untested) on changed methods. Multi-language — TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Java, Kotlin, Go, Ruby, C#, Rust, PHP — auto-discovers how the repo generates coverage. Triggers …
analyze-github-issue
A workflow for deeply assessing one GitHub issue, including whether it is a real bug or a reasonable feature request.
gate-wiring
Detects unused exports, orphaned files, architecture layer violations, and circular dependencies across changed files. Delegates to architect agent for structural analysis. Internal gate — invoked by verify.
sw-design
Autonomous solution architecture. Researches the codebase, designs a solution, challenges it adversarially, and produces design artifacts.
sw-review
Fetches and displays PR review comments from GitHub, grouped by priority, and allows the user to reply to or resolve individual threads.
sdd-validate
Verify implementation against the spec and detect drift. Use when the user says 'validate', 'check spec vs code', 'verify implementation', 'are we done', 'any drift', or all tasks are completed and the feature needs final review. Checks coverage, orphan code, constitution compliance, and cross-layer consistency.